Whenever a lib brings up the “living document” argument,
I demand they play poker with me with “living” rules,
and I will be the one determining when a rule needs to change to reflect the present situation.
Or, I’ll ask them when the last time they signed a “living” contract, say a mortgage, where the bank can change the terms at any time to suit their needs.
And, indeed, that’s what the Constitution IS. It’s a contract between the sovereign states and the created entity of the general government.
Trouble is, they think they're the "bank"...
Called a 'variable APR', common as cat crap with credit cards
and not unlike emissions standards in that it is subject to change.
Which is part of this country's problems
A 'deal' isn't a 'deal' anymore.