Posted on 06/23/2011 6:09:10 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Gary Poyssick, an early employee of software giant Adobe System Inc., continues to maintain there is something "fishy" about the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House.
"What the White House released is not a simple scan," Poyssick told WND. "Something digital came between the paper and the glass."
Poyssick was at the San Jose-based tech company when it counted no more than 14 employees, and he continues to advise and write on Adobe software products
Poyssick, who today devotes his energies to running The Online Fisherman in Tampa, Fla., has written more than 50 titles about Adobe software, the printing industry, coding and programming, website development and workflow management.
His initial reaction was to declare the birth certificate an outright forgery.
"I could have done a much better replica myself, if the president had asked," Poyssick told The Political Sandbox blog when the birth certificate first appeared and he opened the document in Adobe Illustrator. "The guy that did this is a bimbo in that he forgot to 'flatten' his works to soften the background edges so the fake letters blended, softly into the green paper.
Observing that the birth certificate document had multiple layers when opened in Adobe Illustrator, Poyssick was amazed the White House had released an electronic PDF file that had not been "flattened" so as to remove all evidence that it had been modified.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
In other news, 8559 Adobe employees say Obama’s Birth Certificate is a forgery.
So dweeb in teh White Hut basement is collecting all the expert advice and will soon produce the document to be filed in AbercrumbieGumby’s archives in Hawaii. Before the 2012 voting date, barry the bassturd will have it re;eased to the world at large. Of course the little dweeb will already be worm food ... can’t have any witnesses who might have a change of hope, er I mean change of heart. Governor Gumby better have a really good cardiologist on 24/7 call.
That is EXACTILY what they are doing.
The race label of AFRICAN to designate who he was is not a valid label in 1960s nor since. Therefore the document did not comply with existing criteria.
Since I’m all for equal rights I ask how do we know it’s a guy who’s the bimbo here?
I suspect that Donald Trump played a willing part in abetting this. Immediately after this forgery was released Obama went on TV and declared the case was closed, the issue had been addressed.
I am a converted anti-birther. I look at the evidence. I am convinced that Obama was double-crossed. This is an OBVIOUS forgery.
Placemark.
Will email you tomorrow.
A nest of libs is unavoidable. I think Obama was outed. And probably the person who set him up is wondering wtf? How can this pig fly for so long?
He didn't just work for Adobe--He helped to develop the very software that was likely used to create this fake document.
1. OBAMA'S MOTHER'S SIGNATURE: Myself, I have a hard time believing---after looking at several of Obama's mother's signatures on the internet---that Obama's mother's signed her name by putting her first name "Stanley" in the bizarre looking parenthesis.
2. ONAKA SMILEY FACE: I have trouble understanding how there is an obvious "face" in the "O" of "Onaka", while on other Hawaii birth certificates on the internet, the "face" is missing from the "O" in "Onaka."
3. OBAMA AND KAPIOLANI HOSPITAL OFFICIALS: Of course, President Obama and Kapiolani Hospital officials would go a long way to prove that Obama's long form is authentic if only President Obama would allow Kapiolani officials to let reporters examine Obama's Aug. 4, 1961---Obama's claimed birth date---hospital records today, but don't hold your breath.
4. April 27, 2011 to June 24, 2011: It has been just about 2 MONTHS and counting since Obama released his long form birth certificate to great fanfare at a White House press conference, but still Obama has not given Kapiolani Hospital officials permission to allow reporters to examine Obama's Aug. 4, 1961 records. Why is that?
5. As I understand it, Kapiolani records would contain the same routine information that we already see on Obama's long form birth certificate, so why won't Obama give Kapiolani permission to allow reporters to look at Obama's records? We want to examine Kapiolani's records in order to have a second party verify that Obama was indeed born at Kapiolani as is stated on Obama's long form birth certificate.
6. So if Obama had no problem in contacting Hawaii officials and obtaining his long form birth certificate, then why in the world is Obama playing hardball when it comes to allowing Kapiolani to let reporters examine his Aug. 4, 1961 records?
7. Is the answer a simple one: There are no Kapiolani records to release, because Obama was not born there on Aug. 4, 1961 as is stated on the long form birth certificate.
8. In my opinion, the longer Obama and Kapiolani hospital officials play hardball and don't release Obama's records, the more VOTES Obaam will lose on election day Nov. 2012.
9. NOTE: If Obama is planning to spring a deadly trap on birther nation by waiting for just the right moment to allow Kapiolani officials to release his Aug. 4, 1961 records, he better not wait too long, because a lot of VOTERS may become so angry with Obama for waiting so long that they will take out their anger in the VOTING booth on election day Nov. 2012 by voting AGAINST Obama.
Bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.