If they do not provide proof, can we assume that he's dead and bomb every Hamas office in the world? Huh? Huh? Can we?
To: Eleutheria5
2 posted on
06/23/2011 10:49:46 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Eleutheria5
To: Eleutheria5
Frankly, I think that Shalit has been dead for quite some time and Hamas encourages a degree of doubt on the matter just because they are arseholes.
4 posted on
06/23/2011 10:53:00 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Eleutheria5
Hamas has already rejected the call, saying that the Red Cross should not intervene in Israel's "security games." Anthony Weiner must be an adviser for Hamas.
To: Eleutheria5
For a moment, I thought this was about Gene Shalit, the movie critic.
6 posted on
06/23/2011 11:01:02 AM PDT by
proud American in Canada
(To paraphrase Sarah Palin: "I love when the liberals get all wee-wee'd up.")
To: Eleutheria5
If they do not provide proof, can we assume that he's dead and bomb every Hamas office in the world? Huh? Huh? Can we?
Why so you need any other reason than it exists to attack any Hamas office anywhere? Feel free.
Sadly, Shalit is probably dead. A prisoner you have to feed and keep under guard, and there is always a risk that he might escape or that the location he is being held will be discovered and a commando mission will free him - how embarrassing to Hamas if either were to happen. Dead prisoners you just bury in a shallow grave. Since Israel has demonstrated that they will exchange live prisoners for the dead there is no downside as an asset in negotiations - you just dig him up when you do the exchange.
7 posted on
06/23/2011 11:31:28 AM PDT by
Cheburashka
(Barack Obama, the Stickless Wonder.)
To: Eleutheria5
Lets just bomb with or without proof, it is what they do.
8 posted on
06/23/2011 12:13:00 PM PDT by
Ratman83
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson