On the surface at least, it certainly appears so. Fact is, if I read it correctly, I can't find any other way to look at it. What's next, standing for an individual against the federales' overreach re 2nd Amendment guarantees? 1st Amendment??? Patiently awaiting on Constitutional "scholars" to weigh in. Oh hey, Jug Ears is a Constitutional scholar. We could check with him...
The way I read it is that if there is any substantive right that you have enumerated to you IN YOUR STATE then a trespass on that right by the feds could give you standing as an injury.
Thing is, I can’t see any way that cases yet to come that cite this decision cannot make clear for more people how the governments actually operate. I’m not accusing anyone of anything devious, but most don’t understand that the rights you have as one of “We the people...” ARE NOT THE SAME THING as the privileges and immunities you get as a “citizen of the United States”.