Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I thought it was liberals who engage in personal attacks rather than addressing issues.

Why are so-called conservatives making petty remarks about Mrs. Fritsch’s looks rather than disputing her assertions?

If what she has to say is so obviously wrong, then FReepers should be able to easily whip off an intelligent rebuttal.

Or not. Perhaps making nasty, catty remarks about someone to whom you feel superior is more appropriate.


80 posted on 06/18/2011 8:44:03 PM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FourPeas

See #71.


85 posted on 06/18/2011 8:45:39 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: FourPeas

“I thought it was liberals who engage in personal attacks rather than addressing issues.”

What freaking issue is this RINO Romney Hack talking about?

None.


116 posted on 06/18/2011 9:04:08 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Murdering unborn children is the highest sacrament in the liberal religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: All
Oh good grief! The woman ran off every anti-Palin talking point there is and ALL have been refuted here over and over again.Take the “she quit” nonsense-that was the smartest political move Sarah Palin ever made—if she had stayed on and bankrupted her family fighting one frivolous lawsuit after another she would not have been there to spearhead the Tea Party Miracle of Nov.2010—I wouldn't have Nikki Haley as my Gov for heavens sake! The GOP would have lost quit a few seats if she had been stupid enough to stay on as AK Gov.
But some PDS suffering Liberal or RINO just keeps saying only that “she quit.”

Rush Limbaugh explained that whenever his GOP friends tell him Sarah is unelectable he would tell them,”So you want four more years of Obama then?”—and his friends would look perplexed.
They are perplexed because they didn't get the deeper meaning. Rush meant that if a true conservative like Sarah Palin is unelectable than you WILL get four more years of Obama.
And if you think Rush is wrong Mark Levin likes her too—neither is endorsing her but neither disagrees with her on the important issues and they certainly do not think she is unelectable.
And I will give more gravitas to the views of Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin than to every vowel and consonant provided by ALL the Palin haters of Free Republic!

119 posted on 06/18/2011 9:05:36 PM PDT by Happy Rain (2012= "E quindi uscimmo a riveder le stelle.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: FourPeas
Did you even *read* the article?

It was a bunch of caterwauling about Palin based on a caller to Rush Limbaugh that most women who are under an "8" on the hotness scale are too damn jealous of Palin to see straight.

This poster is either a paid Romney hack or Rush's caller scored a direct HIT.

You can read my "corrected" version of the article here:

A Jealous Woman's Problem with Sarah Palin (rejoinder to Linda Fritsch)

Cheers!

252 posted on 06/19/2011 5:03:35 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson