I thought it was liberals who engage in personal attacks rather than addressing issues.
Why are so-called conservatives making petty remarks about Mrs. Fritsch’s looks rather than disputing her assertions?
If what she has to say is so obviously wrong, then FReepers should be able to easily whip off an intelligent rebuttal.
Or not. Perhaps making nasty, catty remarks about someone to whom you feel superior is more appropriate.
See #71.
“I thought it was liberals who engage in personal attacks rather than addressing issues.”
What freaking issue is this RINO Romney Hack talking about?
None.
Rush Limbaugh explained that whenever his GOP friends tell him Sarah is unelectable he would tell them,”So you want four more years of Obama then?”—and his friends would look perplexed.
They are perplexed because they didn't get the deeper meaning. Rush meant that if a true conservative like Sarah Palin is unelectable than you WILL get four more years of Obama.
And if you think Rush is wrong Mark Levin likes her too—neither is endorsing her but neither disagrees with her on the important issues and they certainly do not think she is unelectable.
And I will give more gravitas to the views of Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin than to every vowel and consonant provided by ALL the Palin haters of Free Republic!
It was a bunch of caterwauling about Palin based on a caller to Rush Limbaugh that most women who are under an "8" on the hotness scale are too damn jealous of Palin to see straight.
This poster is either a paid Romney hack or Rush's caller scored a direct HIT.
You can read my "corrected" version of the article here:
A Jealous Woman's Problem with Sarah Palin (rejoinder to Linda Fritsch)
Cheers!