Posted on 06/17/2011 3:52:03 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Just happened, very strange! Wolf Blitzer Interview with Michele Bachmann. Blitzer asked Bachmann 5 times do you agree with Tim Pawlenty that Mitt romney is disqualified from being the Republican nominee for president because he supports mandated healthcare.?
She kept responding that she's against obamacare/mandates. Blitzer tried again to pin down some kind of answer. She evaded the question at every turn, didn't want to touch it and finally a frustrated Blitzer then says, "You obviously don't want to answer the question?"
I know people say that nominees shouldn't attack other nominees yet but if not now, when? because Romney is trying to create the "inevitability" card so that momentum carries him eventually to a plurality of the votes on the primaries.
Romney/Anybody is DOA.
By now these guys should have figured out she's not going to engage in hearsay type discussions with mind-numbed, knee-jerk, robot-like Leftwingtard MSM pukes.
Or maybe Wolf has figured that out but he just doesn't imagine himself to be one of those.
This is one of Michele's more endearing traits ~ she only answers the questions she wants to answer.
That's always a reason to not discuss Romney.
Does this mean angry at her if she doesn't get it?
You have spent the past 18 months camped out on Palin threads mostly criticizing Palin.
Now you complain when posters criticize Bachmann.
Your hypocrisy is stunning.
Sarah Palin and the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy that is out to get her
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2735935/posts
Tea Pary favorite? Like hell.
Is there any politician in a lower office that doesn't inspire to be in a higher office? Very few if any.
Give me a break ~ that's not a legitimate question ~ that's just more Leftwingtard puke.
Michelle's approach to being tossed that sort of garbage is to not respond to it.
Let me tell you, people who let Wolf Blitzer lead them around by the nose will find themselves doing a Tony Weiner ~ and you just don't want that.
“This might reveal her real goal, a VP nomination.”
BINGO!
she went after Mitt’s mandate from bunker Hill.
Good for you, and for your mom. It is great that she has you to go to bat for her in the midst of all the bureaucratic foolishness.
I will add you both in my prayers, FRiend.
Tatt
If she doesn’t run, we all lose, IMO.Bob
One is ready and one is not.
Are all you people THICK? MSM is just trying to get campaign ad material for the general election. If Romney gets the nod, you'll see ad after ad of Pawlenty & Bachmann (if she caves) trashing Romney. The dem ad saying, “see even their own party thinks he stinks”.
Last time we let the MSM pick our nominee. Let's not give them ANY help this time.
Yes, let the voters decide. A novel idea.
Here you go.
“However, even on a state level and even a local level, mandates coming from a governing body, it’s tough for a lot of us independent Americans to accept, because we have great faith in the private sectors and our own families … and our own businessmen and women making decisions for ourselves. Not any level of government telling us what to do.”
Well gee I am getting along in years but I do remember Ronald Reagan chose or was forced to choosey, persons unknown, the honorable George Herbert Walker Bush as his running mate. You know the one that called Reagan’s economic policies “Voodoo Economics”
did you see her email (out of the 24,000) that said she wouldn’t even support a mandate requiring helmets? that said it all right there for me. Mitt require you to submit to the state to the last full measure. Palin telling those pushing for helmet laws to go fly a kite...
I would’ve said, “You tell me, Wolfe.”
Wolfe just wants a sound bite.
“We Republicans don’t eat our own just for the pleasure of the media, Wolfe.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.