To: Jane Long; All
THIS ARTICLE IS FROM JULY 21, 2006 WHEN BACHMANN WAS MAKING HER FIRST RUN FOR CONGRESS.
27 posted on
06/16/2011 7:41:21 PM PDT by
kristinn
(Lowering the IQ on FR since Jul 31, 1998)
To: kristinn
Thanks for pointing that out. That makes more sense. I don’t know why this was posted as if it was recent.
36 posted on
06/16/2011 7:44:02 PM PDT by
Brett11
To: kristinn
Thanks for bringing the date to our attention.
Not much different than gettng your start at Tony Rezko's house...
45 posted on
06/16/2011 7:46:05 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(JMO but I reserve the right to be wrong...)
To: kristinn
Then the date either needs to be in the headline or the article pulled. Can you get that done?
47 posted on
06/16/2011 7:47:30 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
To: kristinn; RED SOUTH
Gosh, wouldn’t it be nice if the poster lifted a damn finger to let us know this article is five years old?
55 posted on
06/16/2011 7:49:59 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: kristinn
LOL. You get the prize kristinn. I was scrolling down to see who would be the first one to notice. Shows how often we fail to notice sources and dates. Fortunately, I caught this one because it didn’t sound right that it mentioned Rove and White House in the same sentence.
83 posted on
06/16/2011 8:05:54 PM PDT by
WVNan
To: kristinn
THIS ARTICLE IS FROM JULY 21, 2006 WHEN BACHMANN WAS MAKING HER FIRST RUN FOR CONGRESS. So it is. Apparently, Michele has been owned by the ruling class establishment from the very beginning of her career in Washington.
113 posted on
06/16/2011 8:43:08 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson