Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Release Draft Guidance (Water Regulations)
Environmental Protection Agency ^ | 5/11/11 | EPA, John Senn

Posted on 06/16/2011 12:31:45 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
While his name is not mentioned, one might suspect the fingerprints of the Regulatory Czar, Cass Sunstein, are on this.

According to some knowledgeable friends of mine, they explained it this way to me. The new guideline would do the following:

The Obama administration's US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) jointly released a new draft guidance for the federal Clean WAter Act that aims to dramatically expand both the scope of what constitutes a "Water Source," as well as the legal power federal agencies can exert over those water sources.

If enacted, the proposal will basically allow the EPA and the ACE to control any stream, pond, or even puddle that they determine "has a physical, chemical, or biological connection" to any larger body of water, which includes even privately-owned water sources.

One of the biggest impacts of the guidance will be to REVERSE PREVIOUS SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THAT HAVE ESTABLISHED THE PROPER CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY OVER NOT ONLY WATER, BUT OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES.

By undoing these decisions, the EPA and ACE will essentially be giving themselves a free pass to arbitrarily develop and ESTABLISH THEIR OWN RULES and they will be able to do so WITHOUT PROPER CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL.

The EPA and ACE claim that expanded jursidiction is needed to protect water from pollution and other contaminants.

1 posted on 06/16/2011 12:31:54 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

Can anyone say “Agenda 21?”


2 posted on 06/16/2011 12:33:35 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

The EPA needs to be defunded now.


3 posted on 06/16/2011 12:37:57 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83

Self ping


4 posted on 06/16/2011 12:41:06 PM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amom; Kaslin; neverdem; GonzoII; DLfromthedesert; holdonnow; Alamo-Girl; eeevil conservative; ...

I just wanted to get word out about this continuation of attacks on our liberty by this administration through the Executive Branch organizations.

For those who are disposed to pray, I would ask that you would include in your prayers the call to the Lord for:

The full exposure of all that may be hidden behind the revised Clean Water Act and those who are an integral part of constructing it.

The protection of private property rights and private water rights.

The actions of those who have malignant intentions to circumvent our Congress and Constitution.


5 posted on 06/16/2011 12:41:42 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (Anarchy IS the strategy of the forces of darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewHampshireDuo

Hmmmmmmmmmmm I think I can.


6 posted on 06/16/2011 12:42:55 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (Anarchy IS the strategy of the forces of darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Agreed.


7 posted on 06/16/2011 12:43:50 PM PDT by TEXOKIE (Anarchy IS the strategy of the forces of darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; narses; SunkenCiv; steelyourfaith; SmithL; CPOSharky; patton; CholeraJoe; TEXOKIE

Oh yes, it is deliberate.

What they are “saying” and what they are “doing” are complimentary => They are using the EPA through this little “revision” to require that the EPA control every square of the US surface...

Because every square mile of the US surface drains into a stream that drains into a waterway.


8 posted on 06/16/2011 12:51:25 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
I'm certainly not in favor of ZERO regulation. And I don't think people want raw sewage in their waterways. And I think gross polluters ought to be severely punished.

I don't think that most here on FR want a filthy water situation. However we need to regulate EPA as much as EPA needs to regulate the environment. We have given those in the EPA far more power to affect people lives than anyone should ever have. Many of these people are ideologues. They don't give a rats *ss about the economics of their rulings. And they refuse to believe in the laws of diminishing returns.

And I too happen to think Cass Sunstein might be the most dangerous person in Washington D.C.
9 posted on 06/16/2011 12:58:26 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
The Clean Water Restoration Act (S. 787) died in the last Congress as it well deserved.

As with so many other regulations coming out of DC, this is just another end run around legislation by the Executive branch of our gov't.

S.787 would have just eliminated the word "navigable" from the term "navigable waterways" in the 1972 Act thereby rendering ALL WATER IN THE US to be under EPA control.

THIS MUST BE STOPPED NOW!!!!!!!


10 posted on 06/16/2011 12:59:26 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

PING


11 posted on 06/16/2011 1:01:39 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE
snip from the article:

"Water flows down hill........"

Yes, and crap rolls down hill too...like this EPA crap...
I have a brook in my yard - I HATE the EPA!

12 posted on 06/16/2011 1:02:00 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27
Me too.
If this is allowed to continue, be prepared to forfeit 200’ on either side to the EPA.
13 posted on 06/16/2011 1:09:37 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Always remember. Water regulation doesn't end at the shoreline. They'll regulate it right back to the clouds if they can.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
14 posted on 06/16/2011 1:11:25 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
YUP!

If this continues, I will be forced to cede 120,000sq.ft. of my property to the EPA. This would include my house and several outbuildings.

This is EXACTLY the kind of thing the Second Amendment was ratified for!!!

15 posted on 06/16/2011 1:18:38 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
If this is allowed to continue, be prepared to forfeit 200’ on either side to the EPA

Yup, that's what I stay awake at night thinking about. It's bad enough I can't build anything new on most of my property but my house could be forfeited (it's inside that 200' - high on a hill, but of course, that doesn't count....)

My house was built during WWII - they can stuff-it.....

16 posted on 06/16/2011 1:19:02 PM PDT by libertarian27 (Ingsoc: Department of Life, Department of Liberty, Department of Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27
It's bad enough I can't build anything new on most of my property...

...nor are we allowed to reinforce the banks to counteract the effects of erosion.

17 posted on 06/16/2011 1:22:51 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TEXOKIE

Thank you for bringing this to light. People need to contact their congressional representatives to put brakes on these unelected bureaucrats.

Instead we’re distracted with Wienergate and other meaningless stupidities.


18 posted on 06/16/2011 1:24:33 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

Around here, cities are charging fees for parking areas that impede rainfall from soaking into the ground. They originally called it a tax but someone pointed out that imposing a new tax would require a vote they may lose so they changed it to a fee.

One small trucking company is closing because the owner just can’t afford the extra $1000 per month.


19 posted on 06/16/2011 1:26:28 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Is that because of the falling waterlevel in the lakes?

I'm thinking here about post-glacial rebound which the powers that be seem oblivious to.

20 posted on 06/16/2011 1:31:44 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson