Skip to comments.
Graham raps Boehner, GOP candidates on Libya, Afghanistan
McClatchy ^
| 2011-06-15
| James Rosen
Posted on 06/16/2011 10:19:04 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
WASHINGTON Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham criticized his party's presidential candidates and congressional leaders for increasingly advocating an international isolationism that he said repudiates the legacies of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.
The South Carolina senator mocked seven GOP presidential candidates' discussion of foreign policy in Monday night's New Hampshire debate as "shallow" and full of "platitudes."
(snip)
"I was very disappointed that no one articulated why it matters if we win or lose in Afghanistan," Graham said. "No one articulated what would happen if (Libyan strongman Moammar) Gadhafi stays in power. So we have Republicans talking about stopping our efforts in Libya."
(snip)
Without naming him, Graham ridiculed GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain, former chief executive of the Godfather's Pizza chain, for having said in the debate Monday evening that he wouldn't allow a Muslim to serve in his Cabinet.
"Everybody is for making sure we vet Muslims in the Cabinet," Graham said. "That is the least of my concerns. My concern is: Will the Republican Party come to grips with what it takes to win the very long struggle with radical Islam?"
(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 112th; bho44; grahamnesty; lindseygraham; mccain; mccain4obama; mccainantigop; mccaintruthfile; rino; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
"So we have Republicans talking about stopping our efforts in Libya."
"Our"???
FULG!!!
To: upchuck
2
posted on
06/16/2011 10:19:58 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
Sorry Lindsey we’re burned out on spending money and lives on rebuilding foreign countries. Enough is enough.
To: rabscuttle385
Barry, please appoint him to something!! He’s an embarrassement as an elected official.
To: rabscuttle385
Lindsey Graham is truly despicable, and I know from family in SC that the good people of SC are truly embarrassed by him. Nobody expected him to turn out like this. He’s awful, not only sucking up to Obama at every turn, but stabbing other Republicans in the back whenever he can.
5
posted on
06/16/2011 10:24:48 AM PDT
by
livius
To: rabscuttle385
there is a ring and a string in this little puke's back that john mccain pulls. thats obvious.
besides that, little lindsey is still mad that weiner didn't send him any pics.
6
posted on
06/16/2011 10:26:22 AM PDT
by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: rabscuttle385
Just one of a host of always dependable “Moderates” in the Republican party.
7
posted on
06/16/2011 10:27:51 AM PDT
by
headstamp 2
(We live two lives, the life we learn and the life we live with after that.)
To: AuntB; calcowgirl; Liz; SandRat; NFHale; Gilbo_3; hiredhand; DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; ...
8
posted on
06/16/2011 10:28:36 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
My response to Lindsey Graham,
in the manner of Yul Brenner in
The King and I "YOU, are very difficult woman!"
***no offense to all the genuine ladies of the USA***
To: rabscuttle385
South Carolina! Would you recall this retarded goober? Please!
To: rabscuttle385
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham criticized his party's presidential candidates and congressional leaders for increasingly advocating an international isolationism...
In 1943 Garet Garrett wrote an article titled "The Mortification of History," he wrote about this very thing. Here is a short excerpt:<
...If you say of this history that its intense character has been nationalistic, consistently so from the beginning until now, that is true. Therefore, the word in place of isolationism that would make sense is nationalism. Why is the right word avoided?
The explanation must be for the wrong one, for that is what it is intended to do, it is the perfect political word. Since isolationism cannot be defined, those who attack it are not obliged to defend themselves. What are they? Anti-isolationists? But if you cannot say what isolationism is, neither can you say what anti-isolationism is, whereas nationalism, being definite, has a positive antithesis. One who attacks nationalism is an internationalist.
The use of the obscurity created by the false word is to conceal something. The thing to be concealed is the identity of what is speaking. Internationalism is speaking.
It has a right to speak, as itself and for itself, but that right entails a moral obligation to say what it means and to use true words...
11
posted on
06/16/2011 10:30:27 AM PDT
by
fallujah-nuker
(Pakistan delenda est)
To: rabscuttle385
Demote him from Colonel to Corporal. Transfer him from AF to Army. Give him a 70 pound ruck, M-16, basic load and let him walk up and down dusty mountains all day if he loves the ME so damned much!
After we go into Libya, what's next? Syria?
12
posted on
06/16/2011 10:31:22 AM PDT
by
donozark
(British Army, Fighting Proudly in Afghanistan-Since 1839)
To: donozark
13
posted on
06/16/2011 10:34:39 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
(Live Free or Die)
To: rabscuttle385
Gramesty, why do you not make it official, you are a damn democrat.
To: rabscuttle385
If Graham wants us to wage war without end in four different countries at the same time he at least owes us an explanation of how "winning" in Afghanistan will prevent 19 crazed Islamists with box cutters from crashing the World Trade Center.
And if "winning" in Afghanistan will do it, how will we stop 19 coming from Libya? And if we can wage war and stop them in Libya, how will we stop them coming from Yemen? And if we can stop them from coming from Yemen, how will we stop them from coming out of the barrios of Iraq?
And, Sen. Graham, if we manage to dodge all the IED's in these lands, will we have to wage war from Casablanca to the nether reaches of China and occupy the whole of the Islamic world to stop these 19 terrorists?
Sen. Graham can you please explain how these wars are making us safer instead of just poorer and weaker and bereaved?
15
posted on
06/16/2011 10:36:42 AM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: rabscuttle385
Bonehead is a sorry leader of the House.
Sweet Lindsey is a sorry senator.
Good riddance to both.
To: rabscuttle385
To: rabscuttle385
To: kingattax; rabscuttle385
” besides that, little lindsey is still mad that weiner didn’t send him any pics. “
Are you sure?
19
posted on
06/16/2011 10:40:42 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
To: rabscuttle385
There is a BIG DIFFERENCE between Isolationism and the respect we are shown by these asshats after we help them with our blood, our time and our money. We get ZERO respect, we get ZERO credit and then we have Iraq possibly suing US over $6 billion.
And now we have a CIC who doesn’t even think that he needs to consult Congress since “we are in a supporting role.” Well, gee, thanks for that clarification, Obama!!
FAIL!!
20
posted on
06/16/2011 10:46:00 AM PDT
by
Eagle of Liberty
(Clueless showpieces at the top; a whole lot of unelected second-tier "staffers" running the show)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson