[Iron Munro]

NATO is now the Taliban.

This insanity has got to stop!

[OldNewYork]

If we haven’t had any qualms bombing his grandchildren to death, I can’t see a pile of old stones making much difference, as valuable as they are to history.

[Psalm 144]

And why not? NATO is assisting jihadists, who have proven to be vandals everywhere.

[Ghost of Philip Marlowe]

Amazing how one administration can put a nation so quickly on the wrong side of history.

[Charles Martel]

Roman ruins are inconsequential to the Caliphate.

[Argus]

Gee, when is NATO going to bomb Syria to protect those civilians from their mass murdering dictator? Oh, right. The Europeans get most of their oil from Libya, so priceless Roman ruins be damned.

What the Vandal invaders left intact 1600 years ago, the new barbarians will destroy.

[no-to-illegals]

apparently those Roman ruins are not ruined enough.

[Cicero]

Disgusting.

Muslims could care less about Roman ruins, except for the tourist dollars they bring in. But you might think that NATO would know better.

Maybe there are worse things to worry about, but I am worried about the antiquities in North Africa. The only reason why the Muslims who ruled Egypt didn’t destroy all those antique statues is that they were safely buried under the sand. Now they are out in the open, ready to be destroyed like so many other remnants of the ancient civilizations that preceded these barbarians.

If they would blow up ancient statues of Buddha, they would also likely blow up statues of the old Egyptian Pharoahs, since human images violate Muslim teachings. The antiquities in Egypt were not really dug up until after the Caliphate had fallen. But I don’t trust them to what is coming.

Far worse if NATO sets the example. And for what?

[maine-iac7]

These ruins - majestic, historical. survived over 2,000 years - and this regime would have NO qualms destroying it. Scum. Tells any sane person all one needs to know.

Name ANYthing being built today that will still have one stone left upon another 2,000 years from now.

[ari-freedom]

The Romans had no problem with destroying Jerusalem so I’m not going to lose any sleep if we have to bomb a bunch of old Roman bricks.

[no-to-illegals]

When thinking of history and islam, one only has to view an islamic nation. Death and destruction everywhere the eye can see unless there is an iron hand at play. islam understands only the iron hand, and in the case of the Roman ruins why would islam treat any past culture with respect, for it is not of islam? NATO and the zer0, zer0 the head of the beast. This is a fantasy time in history where past reality becomes unlikely to survive. Pray I am wrong, I do every day.

[married21]

I hate this Libya war-ish thingy.

[darkside321]

We will strike military vehicles, military forces, military equipment or military infrastructure that threaten Libya...

---

Or in other words we targed everything which is not a good old muslims who devoted his live (future suicide bomber)
to the “rebels”.
Don´t you love it how our governments enforce the do not move zone.
Ups my fault i mean the no “fly zone” over libya.
Yeah i allways wanted that my tax money gets blown up in north africa helpin muslims against muslims who at the end will hate “us” anyway.

[Psycho_Bunny]

Much ado about nothing. Of course they’re not going to commit to leaving the site alone.

I highly doubt they’d actually bomb it, but they’re not going to say that.

[mylife]

Libya arguably has the most intact Roman Ruins on the planet and NATO says they would bomb them for Obamas pointless war.

[Left2Right]

Wasn’t it Monte Cassino monastery that was destroyed in WWII because the allies thought there were German guns there?

[afraidfortherepublic]

Ping...