To: Salgak
Current models have Solar Cycle 24 (starting around 2009) shaping up as being one of the lowest cycles in a couple hundred years.
Meanwhile, solar activity over the past two weeks has taken a dive, even from the modest levels of this cycle:
26 posted on
06/14/2011 4:45:58 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: PapaBear3625
29 posted on
06/14/2011 4:48:27 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: PapaBear3625
If we can somehow launch Mercury into the sun, would that help?
65 posted on
06/14/2011 5:33:04 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(I am utterly opinionless. About everything. Even the fact I have no opinion.)
To: PapaBear3625
I am not trying to be rude but can you tell us all exactly how accurate SolarHam.com is with their predictions about solar activity. Our local weathermen cannot forecast the weather here in the mountains accurately five days ahead of time and these folks are expecting me to believe them for the next decade?
74 posted on
06/14/2011 5:44:49 PM PDT by
B4Ranch
(Allowing Islam into America is akin to injecting yourself with AIDS to prove how tolerant you are...)
To: PapaBear3625
How about this graphical representation of sun activity? Even with the use of sun-block preparations, the incidence of skin cancers have been climbing. You look at these graphs from all over the world, and they all go up. The sun, of course, is causing more than global warming:
81 posted on
06/14/2011 6:09:36 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(2012 can't come soon enough.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson