If the images are offensive WHY is it okay to kill babies?
1 posted on
06/14/2011 4:30:08 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on
06/14/2011 4:31:12 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
3 posted on
06/14/2011 4:32:22 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: NYer
Ping
4 posted on
06/14/2011 4:35:38 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
What crosses the line? The event organizers felt this crossed the line.”How did a picture of an unborn child cross ANY line?
5 posted on
06/14/2011 4:35:54 PM PDT by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: wagglebee
Oh this is just disgusting & outrageous!!
They’ll be getting a polite but firm phone call from me tomorrow. I’m curious why an ultrasound photo is offensive, yet hospitals routinely give them to parents for them to cherish. I’d like an explanation.
6 posted on
06/14/2011 4:36:47 PM PDT by
surroundedbyblue
(Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
To: wagglebee
Acts of the Apostles 5:41 “And they indeed went from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were accounted worthy to suffer reproach for the name of Jesus.”
10 posted on
06/14/2011 4:42:47 PM PDT by
frogjerk
(Liberalism: The ideology of envy.)
To: wagglebee
Spectators, said Pohlman, expressed their outrage at the pro-life banner to him personally. If they would change the image, he added, they would be allowed to march.
What a bunch of bullcrap. Chances are a significant percentage of men and women who will be at that parade have already destroyed at least one child through abortion. THAT'S why the banner was refused. Can't have happy parade-goers feeling any pangs of guilt. Shame on Palatine! Shame on America!
12 posted on
06/14/2011 4:58:00 PM PDT by
mlizzy
(Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee ...)
To: wagglebee
Defense of precious babies and the elderly is offensive to those with cold and hardened hearts. Now, why ruin a perfectly good parade? /s
It’s a sign of the times.
>> “What is offensive is subjective,” said Bill Pohlman
Punk.
14 posted on
06/14/2011 5:46:18 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(*** Jesus ***)
To: wagglebee
Catholics are in denial that they have no place in the larger “culture” of the United States; they should expect no understanding from avowedly secular governments. We can live and work here, but at the end of the day we return to a group of like-minded people; the internet has made this easier than ever, with social networking sites and such. At the most basic level the parish community should be more closely aligned with what these parade-goers believe.
To: wagglebee
16 posted on
06/14/2011 6:03:41 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: wagglebee
Another choice?
Celebrate the Sanctity of Life!
17 posted on
06/14/2011 6:04:22 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: wagglebee
I agree. Since at one time every person on the face of the earth was an unborn child, how can that possibly be offensive?
19 posted on
06/14/2011 6:34:51 PM PDT by
ops33
(Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
To: wagglebee
21 posted on
06/15/2011 1:42:29 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
Every Catholic, every Christian, every pro-lifer, within a hundred mile radius should descend on the parade route carrying signs and wearing shirts with an image of a child in the womb.
22 posted on
06/15/2011 2:06:20 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
To: wagglebee
23 posted on
06/16/2011 9:39:59 AM PDT by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
