Skip to comments.
Catholic group banned from town parade over baby picture on pro-life banner
LifeSiteNews ^
| 6/14/11
| Rebecca Millette
Posted on 06/14/2011 4:29:59 PM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
If the images are offensive WHY is it okay to kill babies?
1
posted on
06/14/2011 4:30:08 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2
posted on
06/14/2011 4:31:12 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
3
posted on
06/14/2011 4:32:22 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: NYer
Ping
4
posted on
06/14/2011 4:35:38 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
What crosses the line? The event organizers felt this crossed the line.How did a picture of an unborn child cross ANY line?
5
posted on
06/14/2011 4:35:54 PM PDT
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: wagglebee
Oh this is just disgusting & outrageous!!
They’ll be getting a polite but firm phone call from me tomorrow. I’m curious why an ultrasound photo is offensive, yet hospitals routinely give them to parents for them to cherish. I’d like an explanation.
6
posted on
06/14/2011 4:36:47 PM PDT
by
surroundedbyblue
(Live the message of Fatima - pray & do penance!)
To: exit82
How did a picture of an unborn child cross ANY line? Good question, especially when you consider that an unborn child is "legally" murdered EVERY 24 SECONDS in the United States.
7
posted on
06/14/2011 4:37:48 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
![](http://static.binscorner.com/d/death-threats-against-bush-at-protests-i/125107023749.jpg)
There's a double standard! Worse at the site -kill, hang, shoot...Bush! http://www.binscorner.com/pages/d/death-threats-against-bush-at-protests-i.html
8
posted on
06/14/2011 4:40:23 PM PDT
by
bronxville
(Sarah will be the first American female president.)
To: bronxville
9
posted on
06/14/2011 4:41:09 PM PDT
by
bronxville
(Sarah will be the first American female president.)
To: wagglebee
Acts of the Apostles 5:41 “And they indeed went from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were accounted worthy to suffer reproach for the name of Jesus.”
10
posted on
06/14/2011 4:42:47 PM PDT
by
frogjerk
(Liberalism: The ideology of envy.)
To: bronxville
There's a double standard! Worse at the site -kill, hang, shoot...Bush! http://www.binscorner.com/pages/d/death-threats-against-bush-at-protests-i.html Offensive as they might be - thanks for posting them. The contrast needs to be shown.
11
posted on
06/14/2011 4:48:42 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed: he's hated on seven continents)
To: wagglebee
Spectators, said Pohlman, expressed their outrage at the pro-life banner to him personally. If they would change the image, he added, they would be allowed to march.
What a bunch of bullcrap. Chances are a significant percentage of men and women who will be at that parade have already destroyed at least one child through abortion. THAT'S why the banner was refused. Can't have happy parade-goers feeling any pangs of guilt. Shame on Palatine! Shame on America!
12
posted on
06/14/2011 4:58:00 PM PDT
by
mlizzy
(Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee ...)
To: wagglebee
Defense of precious babies and the elderly is offensive to those with cold and hardened hearts. Now, why ruin a perfectly good parade? /s
It’s a sign of the times.
>> What is offensive is subjective, said Bill Pohlman
Punk.
14
posted on
06/14/2011 5:46:18 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(*** Jesus ***)
To: wagglebee
Catholics are in denial that they have no place in the larger “culture” of the United States; they should expect no understanding from avowedly secular governments. We can live and work here, but at the end of the day we return to a group of like-minded people; the internet has made this easier than ever, with social networking sites and such. At the most basic level the parish community should be more closely aligned with what these parade-goers believe.
To: wagglebee
16
posted on
06/14/2011 6:03:41 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: wagglebee
Another choice?
Celebrate the Sanctity of Life!
17
posted on
06/14/2011 6:04:22 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: Alex Murphy
Hey Alex, The left have double-standards for everything due to their “liberal tolerance” blarney which makes one pause and debate reasonably but this is an area where I’ll be confrontational with them upfront and in their faces.
18
posted on
06/14/2011 6:11:50 PM PDT
by
bronxville
(Sarah will be the first American female president.)
To: wagglebee
I agree. Since at one time every person on the face of the earth was an unborn child, how can that possibly be offensive?
19
posted on
06/14/2011 6:34:51 PM PDT
by
ops33
(Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
To: wagglebee
Horrible. Just the very message of pro-life and images of living human beings is deemed offensive. These hateful people want hell on earth.
20
posted on
06/14/2011 8:17:08 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson