Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Righthaven was created and exists for one reason, suing people. Seems like a simple case of barratry.

The specifics of this ruling are that the LVRJ only signed over rights to sue over use of their content, but maintained the other rights to the content. That means that when Righthaven claimed injury to themselves, when filing the suits, they were misleading the court. They are toast.

24 posted on 06/14/2011 4:40:05 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: USNBandit

[the LVRJ only signed over rights to sue over use of their content, but maintained the other rights to the content]

How could tey be that stupid?


38 posted on 06/14/2011 6:55:49 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson