Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tijeras_Slim
A poll at the WSJ, "Should work be completed on the proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada?" has close to 3500 responses. Article linked above.

Yes: 95%

No:5%

I rounded numbers.

15 posted on 06/12/2011 3:11:01 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Should work be completed on the proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada?"

I oppose the whole idea of a nuclear waste storage facility. There is too much valuable material in "spent fuel" to bury it forever. It's the uranium and plutonium in the "spent" fuel that have long lives, and they're valuable nuclear fuels. Plutonium and U238 should be recycled in reactors. The fission products could be separated out and stored, if there is no further use for them. They don't need to be stored for geologic ages. In something like 700 years they will have decayed to less radioactivity than the original uranium ore. Storing the fission products has the virtue that if we ever figure out a use for any of those isotopes, they'll be easily recoverable.

17 posted on 06/12/2011 3:39:05 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (New book: RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. A primer on armed revolt. Available form Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson