Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giving Away the Farm--Obama admin is freely giving Russia sensitive info about missile defense
Foreign Policy ^ | JUNE 7, 2011 | JAMES WOOLSEY, REBECCAH HEINRICHS

Posted on 06/12/2011 7:05:50 AM PDT by Ooh-Ah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Venturer
Obama will not be happy as long as the United States can defend itself.

Unilateral disarmament (surrender to Communism) has been the goal of the radical American Left since the 1960s. Sadly Americans were dumbed-down enough to elect one of the most dedicated radicals as our President. Given a Senate majority filled with like-minded "Democratic Socialists," the rest of the story plays out seamlessly.

21 posted on 06/12/2011 8:58:14 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

It is. But the law against treason is very loosely enforced or else half the democrat party would be in prison.


22 posted on 06/12/2011 8:59:30 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
"Eliminate the power of the United States.........."

Don't you and the neocons mean "Eliminate the power of the United States to be the world hegemon".

You NeoCons pulled out all the stops to try to stop the passage of START last year but failed. So now you will try to legislatively preclude the prez, STATE, DOD, and Energy from using certain provisions to implement START, in this particular case, the technology exchanges.

Since foreign policy is the prerogative the Senate we will have to wait and see what happens there.

In the meantime the House GOP has some good veto bait.

23 posted on 06/12/2011 9:11:00 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

I see... and the military establishment is “just going along”.. following orders?..
That would make them TRAITORS..

Have Bill Clinton and Obama promoted TRAITORS as Generals and Admirals of the armed forces?..
WHO, I ask you, would be surprised if they did?..

Take Weasley Clark as an example.. or Colin Powell..


24 posted on 06/12/2011 9:24:03 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


25 posted on 06/12/2011 9:26:46 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

IOW YOU SUPPORT OBAMA giving away our defense technology.

You ARE an idiot.


26 posted on 06/12/2011 9:28:56 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

The United States is being set up for the biggest economic and military “hit” in history.

They must take down the USA to implement the New World Order/One World Government.


27 posted on 06/12/2011 9:35:24 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch
"giving away our defense technology"

NeoCon mis-info.

Can you tell me how you plan to fight the war on terror, the war on Islam, and a rekindled cold war at the same time. How much is all that going to cost?

28 posted on 06/12/2011 9:37:06 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

There’s only one word that normal, sane people can use for this: treason.


29 posted on 06/12/2011 9:40:02 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Can you tell me how you plan to fight the war on terror, the war on Islam, and a rekindled cold war at the same time. How much is all that going to cost?

"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves."

-- Winston Churchill


30 posted on 06/12/2011 9:45:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Are you going to expand troop levels in Afghanistan? Or pull 15,000 out.

Or better yet, let Obama decide, then try to hang it around his neck.

31 posted on 06/12/2011 10:01:27 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

What’s that got to do with giving the Russians our defense assets?


32 posted on 06/12/2011 10:03:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ooh-Ah

Bill Clinton gave all kinds of secrets to the Chi-coms as a result of thier generous campaign donations.
Fairs fair, Obammy deserves to leave office filthy rich too


33 posted on 06/12/2011 10:13:03 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
As pointed out in 28, which you responded to, they are all parts of the military aspects of our foreign policy.

There is a big picture. START starts with Reagan's SALT 3 that advanced as START by the Realists in Reagan's second term, passed by the Realists during GHW Bush. It expired while the NeoCons controlled GW Bush's foreign policy and they wouldn't renew it. When Obama was elected the Realists got the new START passed and now the NeoCons are trying to block implementation of the new START.

And what really has the NeoCons panties in a knot is that if and when START gets implemented, the next treaty will be the comprehensive test ban treaty.

34 posted on 06/12/2011 10:28:23 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Folks,this is treason just like when Clinton gave the Russians the technology to make their subs make less noise.

I think our Military/Indrustial Complex of companies want this information shared so that they have to come up with new ways to defend America against our own technology.

They dont make any profits if no one is fighting. Look at the cost of these new aircraft that our military is wanting to bring on line. The costs get higher and higher and no end is in sight.

Google/U-tube Eisenhower’s speech in 1959 where he warned us to get these people under control or they would ruin America.

They are doing exactly what Eisenhower said they would do!

America was warned 52 years ago and still we have done nothing to stop them. We have only made the problem worse.


35 posted on 06/12/2011 10:33:20 AM PDT by MRBIGMUTTS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

So, do you support a comprehensive test ban treaty, and/or giving our defense assets to the Russians?


36 posted on 06/12/2011 11:48:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I'll answer your question but I can't answer it the way you have framed it.

This article is written by NeoCons so it is mis-info. So you may want to frame it as "giving our defense assets to the Russians", but the actual language is "technology exchanges".

I understand that Free Republic is a NeoCon website and most here toe the NeoCon line. Those here that aren't NeoCons are usually Isolationists. But I am a pragmatic realist so I don't agree with NeoCons and Isolationists.

So last year I supported START with the "exchange" language and still do. Like wise all the prominent Realists gave support. And that included all the living republican ex Secretaries of State, to include Kissinger, Schultz, Baker, Powell, and Rice.

As for a test ban treaty we will have to wait and see, but I will note that the State Dept is claiming that, as it is written now, Kissinger, Schultz and Scowcroft have signed off.

37 posted on 06/12/2011 1:53:43 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Well, it looks like you've got handy pigeonholes for just about everybody, don't you.

Kissinger, Schultz, Baker, Powell, and Rice.

It would be hard to compile a list of five people I distrust more than that one.

38 posted on 06/12/2011 2:12:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ('We hold these truths to be self-evident...' Are you still part of that 'we'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"It would be hard to compile a list of 5 people I distrust more than that one."

That's because you are a NeoCon. You love that nation building stuff.

39 posted on 06/12/2011 2:32:41 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Zero will not be happy as long as there is a conservative Jew or Christian left alive.


40 posted on 06/12/2011 2:38:16 PM PDT by proudofthesouth (Democratic Party - The party of genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson