Posted on 06/12/2011 12:21:23 AM PDT by Nachum
I am pretty sure Bill Clinton, who married the couple, had standards of his own in this....and it looks like theWeiner is a chip off the old block, Bill himself. Doesn’t seem to be any religion that would allow Bill to marry them was involved, so I am assuming neither of them practices any religion in reality.
And yet women here in the ‘west’ support/defend it.
Any woman that does sure isn’t one I’d want to be married to, nor raising, or even near my children. Likewise would any woman with an ounce of sense want to marry a Muslim man.
But they are all about love and peace and unicorns and rainbows, so it’s ‘us’ with a racism problem. It’s their ‘Culture!’
Yea and stool sitting in a petri dish has ‘culture’ too.
NOT want to marry a Muslim man....ARGH! OK, really time for bed after that one.
In my view the whole business of religion is irrelevant to the issue.
All involved are liberals. Liberals shun, loathe, reject religion. That is what liberalism is about.
Neither Weiner nor Huma are religious and reject both Judaism and Islam. They agreed to a civil sham ceremony to satisfy state law and establish rules for financial dealings between the two.
Both are American rejects and that fact should be placed at the top of the list from which judgements must be made.
He converted for the 72 virgins he heard about.
The author had a page to fill up with a short paragraph of information and speculation.
Exactly, its money and power. Liberalism uber alles.
This was a wedding of convenience, in the same way royal families would arrange marriages to strengthen their kingdoms.
The Clintons strengthened their hold on the DNC through this wedding. The is a union of socialists and muslims, just like what we see in the middle east.
Also, just like royal families, these elites are allowed to cheat on their spouses unconditionally.
Getting caught requires the other spouse to make a public play for sympathy, yet still support their elected partner to ensure the kingdom’s hold on power.
Anyone who falls for this is a blind fool.
I believe in a less-expansive definition of “race”, limited to physical characteristics. Islam is an ideology, a political ideology that uses religion as a cloak and as a means of controlling the masses. I support a Constitutional Amendment removing it from the religious protections of the First Amendment and other legislation, since it is in reality a political system that seeks to supplant the Constitution and our system of government. The Constitution is not a suicide pact, and just because they hide behind the fascade of “religion” doesn’t mean we have to be foolish about it.
Beyond that, see tagline.
Do muslims allow pedophile, perverts to become muslims?
He converted for the 72 virgins he heard about.
I’ll bet he sent photos to all 72 for approval!
Your tag line drew this first thought from me, “Those b@st@rds!”
Halal weiner?
Does Huma attend a local mosque in DC or NYC. Does she carry a prayer rug..does she pray 5 times daily?
Stop right there! I need to know right now...
You are being too specific.
Flush all the Demorats, they are anti-American traitorous scum.
Flush all the Muslims from Western Society. They are barbbarians who are not compatible with Civilization. If you don't believe that, wait until the Muslim thugs start their gang rapes of Western Women. Don't believe it? Look at Australia and Europe.
Boys, the fox is in the hen-house....
PLEASE. The most radical Muslim is in the White House. Have you figured out WHY the Muslim playing President spent $Billions on putting the Muslim Brotherhood in power in Egypt?
And why the Muslim in the White House is illegally using the US Military to put Al Qaeda in power in Libya?
Do the headlines make more sense now?
The fox is not only in the hen house, she is sleeping in the nest with the hen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.