I'm plenty angry, but not enough to vote for this guy.
Wow! What a result! I couldn’t have guessed!
If that is true, the Old Guard in both parties had better watch out.
These old hacks seem incapable of solving the spending crisis now at hand.
Good riddance to most of them in 2012.
Bammy is ska-rood.
This is good news. Any voter who isn’t angry about the road our country is going down has to be brain dead.
In each of us two natures are at war....
“Again, anger was strongly related to participation in the 2008 election.”
Right...but it had nothing to do with 2010...NOTHING I SAY!
*snicker*
I'm plenty angry, but not enough to vote for this guy.
It couldn’t have been the case for 2008. I thought Hope’nChange voters were euphoric?
I kept hearing youthful and energetic vs. us the old time bitter clingers.
Indeed, anger does bring out the votes. But a study wasn’t needed to make such a determination. A quick look at our history makes this premiss more than clear.
I hold that civil war is just another way to vote. It can certainly be an ugly, bloody and regrettable way to vote, but a vote it is.
An historic first vote was cast from a ten-inch mortar at 4:30 A.M., April 12th, 1861. Captain James was a skillful officer, and the firing of the shell was a success. It burst immediately over fort Sumter.
Caution and reflection is advised to those who work so diligently to wreck our country, ignore our constitution, ruin our lives and steal our treasure and Liberty.
Anger can certainly bring out the votes.
Anger can also motivate people to refuse to vote...and refuse to buy.
The Institute for the Study of the Bleedin’ Obvious, at it again...