[Don Corleone]

is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,"

What in hell is 'MODERN' Fourth Amendment jurisprudence? Is the Constitution a variable on a day to day basis now? Silly me. Obama and the Marxists don't even recognize its existence.

[Lurker]

Is the Constitution a variable on a day to day basis now?

It has been for decades.

[catman67]

I think that this court decision cost Mitch Daniels his chance at the Presidency. It was HIS court pick that made the majority opinion!

[Flash Bazbeaux]

“What in hell is ‘MODERN’ Fourth Amendment jurisprudence?”

Well, to give just one example, prior to Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Fourth Amendment protected you only from the Federal Government. In other words, until that case was decided, the Fourth Amendment would do nothing whatsoever to prevent a police officer of the State of Indiana or any of its counties, cities or towns from waltzing right into your house any old time.

[MrB]

“Modern” is the giveaway that the judge is a “postmodernist”,
denying that any written law has any value compared to the judgement of those making decisions today.

It’s one of the basic assumptions in liberalism.