So the process is not so mysterious that no one could have done it. Of course that doesn't mean the one is false but a unique process is no longer an argument in it's favor.
Swordmaker may have more information, but I remember reading that other scientists found serious flaws in that scientist claim (the one of recreated the Shroud). There are many aspects of the real Shroud that this scientist conveniently ignored.
“Scientist re-creates Turin Shroud to show it’s fake
TURIN October 07, 2009|By Richard Allen Greene CNN”
So the process is not so mysterious that no one could have done it. Of course that doesn’t mean the one is false but a unique process is no longer an argument in it’s favor.
///
i saw that one also. he absolutely did NOT recreate the shroud. what he did, could be detected and explained. but some atheists on the original team, admitted they couldn’t explain it.
...and Divinc code, and 10000 other articles here, show the insane massive attact CNN, libs, and others make on anything connected to Christianity. while not even covering attrocities against women and gays by Islam.
like this that only appeared in British and Russian newspapers:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2731292/posts
Men should be allowed sex slaves and female prisoners could do the job - Kuwaiti WOMAN politician
DailMail.U.K ^ | 6/7/11
You are gullible if you accept such a simplistic dismissal.
That 2009 attempt was laughable. It met so few of the criteria to "duplicate the Shroud" that it could not even be submitted to peer review because there was NOTHING to peer review! His "duplicate" was only superficially similar to the Shroud but it DID have pigments, the image was NOT made up in the same way that the Shroud's image is made of a nanometers thin coating of caramel like coating of Starch fraction only on the surface of the fibers left over from the fullering processing. This scientist's image soaked into the fibers, penetrated and stained the fibers, and left residues, that left telltale elemental signatures that stood out like red flags under even mild magnification, where the true Shroud shows none down to the electron microscopy level. Sorry... It was a twaddle report that went nowhere in the scientific community. It had legs only in the popular press who had no clue about peer review!