Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indie Sarah Palin flick could alter the 2012 political landscape
The Washington Examiner ^ | 06/06/11 | Rob Bluey

Posted on 06/06/2011 12:00:39 PM PDT by GonzoII

Indie Sarah Palin flick could alter the 2012 political landscape

Long before Sarah Palin became one of America's most polarizing political figures - reviled by the left and critiqued by the right - she was an extremely popular governor of Alaska with a record of major accomplishments.

Years before emerging on the national scene, Palin rightfully earned the "maverick" label for taking on corruption and shaking up the establishment in Juneau.

But to this day, the story of Palin's rise to power remains largely unknown outside of Alaska. While it was part of her best-selling book, "Going Rogue," Americans have heard a different tale from the liberal media - one that portrays Palin as an unintelligent, conniving politician who poses a dangerous threat to the country. It began on Aug. 29, 2008, and hasn’t stopped since.

A new feature-length documentary by conservative filmmaker Stephen K. Bannon seeks to change that perception. It tells the incredible story of Palin's groundbreaking rise in Alaska and foreshadows the unpredictable future that awaits.

I was among a small group of reporters from Washington to view the film recently. It's a powerful story of an amazing woman, but also a sad tale of a life changed forever.

"The Undefeated" is already generating buzz as a film that could alter the 2012 landscape. It will debut later this month in Iowa, home to the first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses.

Bannon, who last year produced “Fire from the Heartland,” a story of conservative women, is so confident that he financed the $1 million documentary himself.

Three years after Palin emerged as Sen. John McCain's vice presidential pick, the movie seeks to educate Americans about her tenure in Alaska. In fact, most Americans won't recognize the Palin they see in this film.

The documentary includes three acts, the first two devoted to a detailed look at Palin's successful stint as mayor of Wasilla and then governor of Alaska. Palin wasn’t interviewed for the film; Bannon instead uses audio tracks from “Going Rogue.”

Long before Palin was a household name in the lower 48, she was facing sustained and sometimes sexist attacks from political adversaries in Alaska.

Not surprisingly, she overcame the challenges and managed to win the respect of many Alaskans for her populist agenda.

Palin’s political career took off in 1996 when she narrowly defeated Wasilla’s incumbent mayor, John Stein, and then went on to defeat him again by a landslide in her re-election bid.

As mayor, Palin cut taxes and transformed Wasilla into a pro-business city that attracted big-box retailers.

Her work paid off. She was appointed to the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, becoming a strong advocate for ethics reform and gaining a reputation for challenging corrupt bureaucrats -- a theme throughout the movie.

This was most evident when Palin took on a fellow commissioner (who was also state Republican Party chairman), stood her ground and resigned from the six-figure job when she grew frustrated with Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski.

That gave Palin an opening to launch an insurgent campaign against the incumbent governor, a towering figure in a state politics. She defeated Murkowski in the Republican primary, then easily beat Democrat Tony Knowles, a former governor, in the general election.

Bannon uses the second act of the documentary to detail Palin’s three major accomplishments as governor: approval of a natural gas pipeline, a tax deal that has left Alaska with a budget surplus and a confrontation with Exxon Mobil over oil development.

Even though the movie begins to drag during the second act, Bannon excites viewers in the third act with the dramatic story of Palin’s selection as vice president and her riveting acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention -- a speech you’ll view differently knowing the details of Palin’s accomplishments in Alaska.

The convention speech is a moment of both joy and sadness. At the time, Palin evoked memories of Ronald Reagan for her masterful way of connecting with people.

But looking back nearly three years, Palin hasn’t lived up to that potential. In fact, after a TLC reality show, two books and numerous speaking engagements, she’s now viewed suspiciously even by conservatives and loathed by many Americans.

It didn’t have to be this way -- and it’s not entirely Palin’s fault. Two weeks after her national debut, the U.S. economy collapsed along with McCain’s campaign. Americans were never exposed to her achievements in Alaska. Instead, they saw Katie Couric quiz Palin about the newspapers she reads and Tina Fey mock her on “Saturday Night Live.”

There's such a stark contrast of Palin before her selection as vice president that you can't help but feel badly about how this story has turned out -- at least so far. But that's also what I found most compelling about the film -- that there is potential for redemption.

“The Undefeated” certainly helps reverse the negative perceptions of Palin, especially the prevailing view that she’s not ready for primetime. However, it will require Americans to actually spend two hours in the theater to find out why.

Bannon told me it might not be as difficult as some might suspect. He said even liberal theater owners are clamoring for a chance to screen the movie, realizing that Palin’s story is a lot more remarkable than even they realized. Aside from selling tickets, Bannon also wants to change minds. That will be a tougher sell.

Rob Bluey is director of the Center for Media and Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation.

 



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: palin; sarahpalin; theundefeated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: RexBeach

Why did she quit as governor if she was doing such a good job?


She was no longer able to do a good job. The entire force of the national democrat party was exerted against the Alaska democrats to stop working with Palin. Bogus law suits crippled her administration which had been reduced to answering FOIA requests and responding to law suits about why she wore a certain coat or why she left the state on a trip.

Her small staff couldn’t accomplish the job of governing because Sarah Palin was a national political target. She could remain as Gov. and be personally responsible to pay the cost of defending against the lawsuits and be totally ineffective for the next year and a half as well as unable to be a factor in the 2010 midterm elections or she could resign and live to play another day. She decided that if she turned over the governorship to her Lt. Gov. that her administration could resume its job of serving the state. She resigned and the bullseye was taken off of Alaska.

She resigned for the good of her state, and she knew very well that there would be a big cost to her politically, but if you think she quit, all you need to do is look at the effect she had on the 2010 midterm elections.


21 posted on 06/06/2011 1:51:19 PM PDT by excopconservative (organize4palin.com (what are you doing to save your country?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
I remember when all the lawsuits poured upon her (at least 11 at the time), and thinking"I wish she would get out of there and help the country". She did, and I have to say I'm always surprised anyone would think she SHOULD have stayed.
22 posted on 06/06/2011 2:09:54 PM PDT by bigjoesaddle ("Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged". - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Don’t give up before the battle. In 2010, we started a battle with the establishment Republicans that we knew would take several election cycles to win.

Compare where we are to the 1976 election when Ronald Reagan almost won the Republican nomination. In the 1974 midterm elections, Republicans lost 48 seats in the House and 5 seats in the Senate in the aftermath of Watergate. Republicans were fighting amongst themselves hoping to find a way forward to victory. We hadn’t sold enough voters on the conservative message and Reagan lost the nomination and the election.

After losing in 76 the Republicans made only modest gains in the ‘78 midterms winning 15 seats in the House and 3 in the Senate. Both the House and Senate were held strongly by the democrats.

In 2010 Republicans won 5 seats in the Senate and 63 seats in the House. Moreover, the seats were won mostly by conservatives. It was called a wave election by some. We had some grassroots level of organization in the TEA Parties bringing disaffected independents to our side. We had some heavy involvement from Gov. Sarah Palin and Sen. Jim DeMint pushing those candidates and encouraging the TEA Parties.

After the 2010 election, the establishment of the Republican Party considered that it had won the election. It had increased its power. The accomplishments of Gov. Palin were not acknowledged and she was even blamed for not winning more seats. When her “Take Back the Twenty” map, which had been 90% effective in ousting democrats from Republican seats, was unfairly blamed for the Tucson shooting, establishment Republicans remained silent. Gov. Palin was allowed to swing in the wind, defended only by conservative talk show hosts.

Palin owes nothing to the Republican establishment. Still, a third party candidacy would not be desirable. We are close to taking control of the Republican party. The election of 2012 against a weak failed President could result in a Republican President and both houses of Congress. Spirited primaries could replace RINOs with more conservatives and increase Republican gains. We have the wind at our back, the TEA Parties still with us.

If we are able to put together a ticket with a strong conservative leader and we make those gains in 2012, we will no longer be running against our own party. We have to do it at the grassroots level, the establishment won’t give it to us. Some are predicting a fight in the Republican ranks like 1976. We don’t want another 1976. We need to make that a short fight and then a campaign like 1980 with our current version of Ronald Reagan.


23 posted on 06/06/2011 2:41:23 PM PDT by excopconservative (organize4palin.com (what are you doing to save your country?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

There are none so blind as those who REFUSE to see.


24 posted on 06/06/2011 2:44:42 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

Lawsuits - a steady, expensive stream of them. As governor, she couldn’t afford to defend herself from them.

In fact, she couldn’t do her job.

Unlike Anthony “Not my dick!” Weiner, she stepped down.

Anybody that claims she isn’t qualified for the White House while Obama is occupying the seat is either dishonest, or such an idiot that pouring piss from a boot would be a challenge . . .

even if the instructions were written on the heel.

The day Obama asks Holder to resign because of Gunrunner, I’ll eat my words. Palin ousted the chairman of the State GOP.

The press had her tampons categorized and bagged, but they couldn’t fact check an article on Obama that CAME FROM AN AP REPORTER while Obama was a Senator that SAID HE WAS BORN IN AFRICA.

The establishment on both sides has been telling Palin in no uncertain terms - ethical people need not apply.


25 posted on 06/06/2011 2:54:02 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

she’s done more for USA since she resigned. She is hardly a quitter. How many miles flown 100,000 for candidates and causes? she didnt curl up in a corner. Like she said in July 2009, she made a tactical move to move forward in a different manner. It’s ok by me to give the Libturds credit; the Libturds did have her in constant “check” in AK NO WAY she does anything for us Americans if she is stuck in AK. Had the ‘Turds been easy on her, she’d still be there and we could be ralllying around Mitt.


26 posted on 06/06/2011 3:38:14 PM PDT by Piers-the-Ploughman (Just say no to circular firing squads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
The dems tried to destroy Sarah Palin after the 2008 campaign with every dirty trick they could come up with and you ask why did she resign?

You're a little behind in your American Political homework.

27 posted on 06/06/2011 3:58:09 PM PDT by Max in Utah (A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

“Why did she quit as governor if she was doing such a good job?”

If you had even a slight interest in Sarah Palin, let alone like her, you would not need to ask that question, you would have known the reason, So therefore I consider answering said question a waste of time.


28 posted on 06/06/2011 4:23:02 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson