Posted on 06/05/2011 10:18:03 PM PDT by Nachum
Like most of her supporters, I’m not interested in her “victimhood”, and the left is hypocritical even in that respect only caring about victims who hate God, America, and freedom. Why belabor the obvious when no one really cares? What matters to me is that Sarah will be a great president, just as she was a great governor. Sarah has my vote, but it has nothing to do with the evil of those who support Obama and of those who say she should have killed her baby.
>>I will bet by the time she announces, is running and in the midst of her campaign that JimRob zots you.<<
I have been very respectful of Mrs. Palin.
Some of her supporters have been less than kind, though.
>>I will bet by the time she announces, is running and in the midst of her campaign that JimRob zots you.<<
I have been very respectful of Mrs. Palin.
Some of her supporters have been less than kind, though.
I have been very respectful of Mrs. Palin.>>I will bet by the time she announces, is running and in the midst of her campaign that JimRob zots you.<<
And you back that claim up by using the formal, "Mrs."Of course if you were really trying to be respectful you could have said Governor Palin. It is that which the PDS sufferer avoids as a vampire avoids sunlight.
>>And you back that claim up by using the formal, “Mrs.”<<
It is impossible to satisfy some people.
I think calling Mrs. Palin by her name is properly respectful. I don’t know her personally, so I do not use the familiar “Sarah” which is bandied about.
You may be correct about the use of “Governor” but I note that appalachian isn’t consistently used by some people. I stand by my polite use of her name.
Apparently PDS cuts both ways.
I defy anyone to find where I have said anything disrespectful of Mrs. Palin. Suggesting she may not win and may not be the proper candidate is not disrespectful. Also, teasing some of her supporters is ALSO not disrespectful to her.
Just for your continuing education, appalachian is about a mountain chain. The word you want is appellation. You are welcome.
>>Just for your continuing education, appalachian is about a mountain chain. The word you want is appellation. You are welcome.<<
Ah, the beauty of spell-check.
Thank you.
So, we shouldn't expect to convince or persuade them, we just have to defeat them.
To them politics is a blood sport, a no-holds-barred fight to the death. The issue is never the issue with them. Their goal is power, period. With power they don't have to reason with you. They simply dictate to you.
Yet, despite it all, we persist in being on our best behavior. We are always statesmen rather than win-at-all-costs politicians. They use our goodness against us. Saul Alinsky advises them in his Rules for Radicals to hold us to the highest possible standards while there should be no standards for them. That is how we end up on the short end quite often. We boot ours out for the slightest indiscretion while they defend and protect the likes of Barney Frank, Anthony Wiener, Bill Clinton, Harry Reed, Charles Rangel, and the myriad of other Scofflaws they support. In fact, they have us so cowed with the media and political correctness we don't even dare to be impolite.
That is the appeal of Palin. She won't be cowed no matter what they do. Once the public finds out what she stands for and what she has done the Left knows they are in trouble. They are as afraid of the message as they are of Sarah.
I am not advising that we become them. I just intend to point out the difference so that we stop being push-overs.
Just don't try that on Senator Boxer . .
>>Just don’t try that on *Senator* Boxer .<<
LORDY NO!
Thanks :)
(actually I would LOVE to have mrs. boxer pull that on me in public. I would be more than happy to remind he that SHE works for ME).
>>Yet, despite it all, we persist in being on our best behavior. We are always statesmen rather than win-at-all-costs politicians. <<
May I suggest sometimes we are a little less than that...
LORDY NO!>>Just dont try that on *Senator* Boxer .<<
Thanks :)
(actually I would LOVE to have mrs. boxer pull that on me in public. I would be more than happy to remind he that SHE works for ME).
See, that's my point. There's not much chance that I'll get the chance to rebuke Senator Boxer in person for her standing on ceremony in her dealings with a general in the US Army. And, IMHO, even less reason to expect that Sarah Palin would ever put on airs like that. So the only way to express my sense of that difference is, hopefully without being too stuffy about it, to model (and in this case to promote) the use of the respectful Governor when referring to Mrs. Palin.
>>See, that’s my point. There’s not much chance that I’ll get the chance to rebuke Senator Boxer in person for her standing on ceremony in her dealings with a general in the US Army. And, IMHO, even less reason to expect that Sarah Palin would ever put on airs like that. So the only way to express my sense of that difference is, hopefully without being too stuffy about it, to model (and in this case to promote) the use of the respectful Governor when referring to Mrs. Palin.<<
You have convinced me. From here on out I will refer to Governor Palin as just that. “Mrs. Palin” felt a little stilted but I thought it was proper.
But babs pugilisitica will be “babs” to me — on FR and, (hopefully) in public :)
Yes, you may and you are probably right. However, I am having a hard time thinking of an example. I would applaud an instance where we stuck it to them if I could remember one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.