Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: worst-case scenario

“He NEVER road with the intention of warning the British!”

That is absolutely and objectively irrelevant since her comment wasn’t about his intention but what he did. Among the things he did was warn the British as a feign to give them pause in a quick attack.

If you weren’t so PDS you could see the objective facts versus what you want to see. lol.


196 posted on 06/08/2011 9:34:54 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Murdering unborn children is the highest sacrament in the liberal religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: rbmillerjr

You keep accusing everyone who criticizes your Dear Leader of PDS. Maybe the problem is YOUR blind uncritical allegiance to your goddess.

Palin answered the general question, “What did you do today, and what did you learn?” (man, there’s a GOTCHA question, eh?) by talking about how Revere warned the British that they couldn’t take away our arms by riding through the town ringing those bells and firing those warning shots.

1.) The purpose of Revere’s ride was NOT to warn the British. No where does she make ANY mention of his real purpose in getting on his horse - nowhere. So she misses out on the POINT of his ride.

2.) He did not “ride through the town.” He wasn’t even IN the town. He was in the country, on the opposite shore. He was waiting for the signal on lantern lights in the steeple of the Old North Church. He rode across open country.

3.) He fired no shots. He rang no bells.

Now, I understand that you are a Palin fanatic, apparently, and that the woman can speak and say no wrong, as far as you are concerned. But the rest of us who have not yet fallen under the spell of La Belle Sarah the Dear Leader, and we know what the real history is.

To me, her answer indicates that she goes into a situation where she is supposed to learn something and she totally misses the main points, instead noticing only the things that she already finds appealing - like gun rights. That, to me, is the sign of a person who shouldn’t be President - especially when she’s being pushed by apparent zealots who take everything she says as gospel.

Your rabid insistence on Palin’s being right about everything has just made me dislike her campaign even more. Maybe Palin’s own at times nutty supporters are driving some of the rest of us into PDS. We can’t afford another four years of yet ANOTHER President who ignores the salient facts in order to spin a story of the world they way they imagine it to be, not the way it is.


197 posted on 06/08/2011 12:35:06 PM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson