Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinsofsolarempirefan
sinsofsolarempirefan said: "This is a disturbing development, although I don’t understand why they haven’t done it before now..."

The main reason is that it is not that easy to dominate 300 million Americans. If a thousand terrorists each take out 30 of us, that will be a loss of 30 thousand Americans to eliminate 1000 terrorists. It's a high price to pay but not so high that we wouldn't pay it. (We lose more people each year on the highways.)

The attack on 9/11 killed about 3 thousand of us. That was about as well as the terrorists might hope to do. Since that time we have killed far more than 3 thousand Al Qaeda, Taliban, and other sympathizers, I'm sure.

From a purely tactical standpoint, I would rather be one of us than one of them. What we must not tolerate is any government attempt to disarm us further in a "misguided" effort to obtain security.

65 posted on 06/05/2011 9:50:01 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

The fear that terrorists inspire has a disproportionate impact to the actual numbers killed, it has always been thus. So it still mystifies me why they haven’t tried it yet...


66 posted on 06/05/2011 9:56:15 AM PDT by sinsofsolarempirefan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: William Tell

I think if such terrosist fire-arms attacks on business centers happened, it would be an attempt to hurt the economy. Maybe they think there’s not much point in this economic climate. But before the economy really tanked? It seems weird that it didn’t happen, at least to me.

Another point about why it might not be done is that almost 10 years after 9/11, we have the weakest and most islamicist sympathetic regime we have had in decades, that is hell bent an weakening the US as much as it can. Why should they attack when they basically have what they want, and we seem to beating ourselves much better than they could? Maybe they think it is better not to rile us, just let us defeat ourselves.

Freegards


69 posted on 06/05/2011 10:04:49 AM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: William Tell
OBL's objective wasn't to dominate 300 million Americans, his objective was to do enough to enrage Americans, provoking us into committing wholesale indiscriminate revenge attacks- atrocities- on random muslims throughout this country and abroad which would then make regular muslims so fearful of persecution they would drop their religious, ideological and national differences, get off their apathetic butts and unify as one angry international movement, the Ummah, under his influence. It would have worked except that Americans are disinclined to behave like tribal middle easterners seeking revenge against an entire opposing tribe down to the last child, and more inclined to pursuing the actual individual perps. The average muslim didn't become convinced he and his family would be targeted by mobs of rioting Americans, which meant OBL didn't get as many indignant paranoid muslim recruits as he hoped for in the west.

Maybe Plan B was to get a sympathizer in office and use him to back the rise of this Ummah, as Obama seems to be doing.

77 posted on 06/06/2011 4:28:43 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson