Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants

“I would support a system where one candidate had to get 50% + 1 votes. If no candidate was able to, then there would be a runoff between the top two.”

NO! That system would succeed in allowing the large population centers to select our leaders. Since they are overwhelmingly Democrat, they would succeed in defeating the votes of flyover country which is overwhelmingly conservative!


63 posted on 06/03/2011 8:42:04 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: stilloftyhenight

Then you haven’t looked at how the population is spread out. There are millions more people in suburban and rural areas than in large cities. With a 50% +1 system, you would get a runoff nearly every time.

Also with the current system, people are discouraged to vote because they think their state will go one way or the other and their vote won’t really make any difference.


117 posted on 06/04/2011 8:38:02 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: stilloftyhenight
Since they are overwhelmingly Democrat Socialist.
129 posted on 06/04/2011 2:26:25 PM PDT by itsahoot (We make jokes, they make progress. Progressivism, Support Palin, or get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson