To: neverdem
"I believe in the Constitution and this is not about taking away anybody's rights," said Kornell. "But people do not have a right to own a personal military assault weapon."
Sez who? Who died and put you in charge of what people can and cannot own, a$$hole? The second Amendment makes no such distinctions. If you had ever read it, which I am sure you have not, you would know that. Now slither back under your rock you slimy little worm.
16 posted on
05/31/2011 11:45:21 AM PDT by
NWFLConservative
(Game On.......Fight Like a Girl!!...............Saracuda in 2012)
To: NWFLConservative
"But people do not have a right to own a personal military assault weapon."A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to give people "a right to own a personal military assault weapon" because the people are the militia.
20 posted on
05/31/2011 11:49:30 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson