I understand, but liberals use the same logic for trying to ban guns....
I think this case is worthy of a serious discussion of constituitional rights, regardless of the political affliation of those arrested. To me it’s a great question: when does the public’s right to quiet and tranquility at a national monument trump the rights of those who want to dance or talk or otherwise not engage in typical forms of disruptive behavior?
A demonstration is a demonstration. The left is using this to open the door to protests at these monuments—and, as the article points, out as international propaganda to falsely portray the United States as an authoritarian police state.
Just because people are allowed to have guns does not mean they can use them anyway, anywhere. THAT is the analogy.