Skip to comments.
It’s All Over: Kyoto Protocol Loses Four Big Nations
watts up with that? ^
| Anthony Watts
Posted on 05/30/2011 9:39:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
2
posted on
05/30/2011 9:41:26 PM PDT
by
Larry Lucido
(Free Lazamataz! With every purchase!)
To: NormsRevenge; steelyourfaith; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; tubebender; Carry_Okie; Brad's Gramma; ...
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: Larry Lucido
Now Obama needs to stop the EPA.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I wonder who twisted Obama’s arm on this?
6
posted on
05/30/2011 9:46:04 PM PDT
by
SatinDoll
(NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
You have to wonder how many billions or trillions we already wasted on this POS aimed directly at the heart of the USA.
Bolton was the only one with enough stones to actually stand up for American interests — and we see what that got him.
If it starts with “UN” it means “retirement fund for dictators.”
7
posted on
05/30/2011 9:46:42 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Warmist Pope Gore is pissed.
8
posted on
05/30/2011 9:47:21 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: SatinDoll
I wonder who twisted Obamas arm on this? The coming election twisted Obama's arm.
We have double-digit unemployment and any "emission cuts" mean more unemployment. All for Al Gore's chicken little fantasy? Homey don't play that.
9
posted on
05/30/2011 9:51:10 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
We need a treaty to reduce climate scientists by at least two-thirds. It would make the world more livable.
10
posted on
05/30/2011 9:57:38 PM PDT
by
pallis
To: freedumb2003
If it starts with UN it means retirement fund for dictators.May the corpse of the UN rest in the sands of the sea, so far out that they will never be seen again. The world would be a better place without them.
11
posted on
05/30/2011 9:58:26 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Now Obama needs to stop the EPA. Given that Zero's agenda has always been economic suicide and payoffs to his backers, fat chance of that happening.
12
posted on
05/30/2011 9:59:49 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: SatinDoll
I wonder who twisted Obamas arm on this?Nobody had to twist his arm. Ubama gulped as he admitted at the G8 dinner that the US would not participate in the "Kyoto Protocol", believe me. He simply realizes that political support evaporated after the scam was exposed for all the world to see in November 2009 ("Climategate"). Now, Ubama and the rats are left to try to appease the Environazis by abusing the regulatory power of the EPA and the Department of Energy.
To: freedumb2003
This is a big step but, the fanatics are still working on
AGENDA 21 to push for U.N. dominance over America.
No matter how they sell it, we are the target.
14
posted on
05/30/2011 10:03:09 PM PDT
by
Baynative
(Truth is treason in an empire of lies)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Greenpeace apparently doesn’t recognize irony when they put a polar bear outside, in the snow, holding a margarita with a sign that says “what about global warming?” Looks pretty cold in that picture to me.
15
posted on
05/30/2011 10:05:17 PM PDT
by
wastedyears
(SEAL SIX makes me proud to have been playing SOCOM since 2003.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
16
posted on
05/30/2011 10:09:40 PM PDT
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Developed countries signed the Kyoto Protocol in 1997. They agreed to legally binding commitments on curbing greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.
Whatever Clinton agreed to in '97 was not legally binding on this country because Congress (the Senate) never acted on it. Is this correct?
17
posted on
05/30/2011 10:12:24 PM PDT
by
Let_It_Be_So
(Once you see the Truth, you cannot "unsee" it, no matter how hard you may try.)
To: berdie
18
posted on
05/30/2011 10:20:00 PM PDT
by
berdie
(qill)
To: Let_It_Be_So
The Senate adopted a resolution in 1997 stating that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol to, or other agreement regarding, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, at negotiations in Kyoto. The vote was 93-0. So, you’re right, the treaty was not even brought up by the Senate for passage.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
20
posted on
05/30/2011 10:34:34 PM PDT
by
matt04
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson