Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heye2monn

There was the Supreme Court case of Reynolds vs. the United States, where polygamy, incest, and neglect of children were all ruled illegal regardless of marriage license or state sanctioning of the actions, and they specifically defined the ruling as a means of keeping a common rule for everyone to follow. Only problem is that nowadays, people speak so loudly against the idea of common law, when having a common law actually makes society somewhat decent.


34 posted on 05/31/2011 11:41:37 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Morpheus2009

Very interesting — the Supreme Court relied on common law for condemnation of polygamy, etc.! Fascinating.

Common law, as you point out, is a thin reed indeed. What, after all, is common law in San Francisco?


40 posted on 06/01/2011 5:46:12 PM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson