Posted on 05/29/2011 10:08:34 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
“... Observational evidence is not very useful. .
///
great quote! any honest scientist, should be outraged!
and when the the observational data disagrees with the models, they simply change the data...
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/hiding-the-decline-in-washington-dc/
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html
“... stations have dropped from a peak of 1,850 in 1963 to a low of 136 as of 2007. ... including all the cold ones in California. “
Hadley's "hide the decline" was actually an effort to make the Medieval Warm Period disappear, but there's no question that they've consistently faked and manipulated the data.
“So they will spend at lest 3 BILLION dollars to build wind turbines, that will only work when it is windy, yet they can use natural gas at 1/15 of the cost.”
If the British people ever figure out how hoodwinked they’ve been, there’ll be hell to pay.
Well, thank goodness they’re doing SOMEthing right. They’re gonna need all that those new plants put out every time the wind stops blowing.
...a plan for 800 giant new wind turbines on mid-Wales hills. In the Welsh Parliament, Glyn Davies said "the two-megawatt turbines would cost at least [$2.7 billion, plus another $500 million] for the infrastructure." In contrast, a far bigger gas-fired power plant near Plymouth will produce power without subsidy at one fifteenth the cost -- and without disfiguring the Welsh hills.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.