Bravo to them; they can’t be a part of that evil.
These scenarios make it all the more unlikely that anyone who really cares for a child would ever put them up for adoption. The idea of someone else doing a better job is something from the past. You know there will be a quota system to ensure that 51% of children are placed with deviants...
Russia does not allow adoptions by queers or lesbians.
Recently, Russia forbid adoptions by singles, too.
Only married couples can apply.
If they were gay, they wouldn't be homosexuals.
Bravo to the diocese for upholding their faith. It's disgusting what theses perverts are trying to do to harmless and thoughtful organizations. If they're so dedicated to the idea of adoptions, why don't they establish their own Gay Men and Women Adoption Agency, and have people come to them. Leave the morally unchallenged alone.
Could they have ‘in-house’ adoptions and foster care within the Catholic Church?
It’s time to start suing the states.
They are encroaching into religious activities. Religious denominations have been involved with adoptions and orphanages far, far longer than secular society has.
finally sue them for interfering with the practice of their religious faith. I mean if states are forced to offer footwashing stations for muzzie cab drivers they ought to be forced to allow religious adoption agencies to be able to adopt to whoever they determine they morally are able to.
This happened in Massachusetts as well. They passed the law, and the Catholic Church had to stop adoptions.
The Libertarians who like to post here should remember this when they so ardently champion the “civil unions” compromise as preserving marriage. It’s every bit as deadly and oppressive as fake marriage.