It started with the argument that whatever consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms should be legal, but that was only the first step. The left’s end game is the suppression of Judeo-Christian morality in order to recreate the world in their image, a brave new world so to speak.
They are rebels, and they are rebelling against what they see as the moral repression of the past. I think we still outnumber them, but they control popular culture, the education system, and large portions of the government. They won’t give up, because they appeal to the worst in man.
Free love is great in theory, much like communism. Wouldn’t it be great to have guilt free sex with whoever you wanted whenever you wanted without any negative repercussions—no diseases, no jealousy, no unwanted pregnancies? Same thing with communism. Wouldn’t it be great if everyone shared their possessions or even the concept of individual property ceased to exist?
The problem is, these concepts are lies that have absolutely zero chance of ever working in the real world. If the left succeeds in destroying the “repressive” past, they have nothing workable to replace it with. They only know how to demolish society. They have absolutely zero clue how to build one up. Of course, that doesn’t stop them from trying.
Well, I would say that it started with the idea that the state’s definition of marriage is dominant over the actual definition of marriage, as defined by faith and reality.
But yeah, it seems like kicking over “gay marriage”, an impossibility, is kind of a weird line to draw when the homosexualists have already beaten the standards that would matter, like homosexualist sodomy. Not that it shouldn’t be voted against. But when’s the last time the subject has ever come up? Lawrence vs. Texas? Has there been attempts to restore sodomy laws by amendment or repeal of pro-sodomy laws by general election? If so, how has the vote gone?
Freegards