Posted on 05/23/2011 6:27:02 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
I haven’t read the thread or article, rather other information from the web. Regardless of the credibility of the woman flooding the media...I do believe Strauss is guilty of the sexual attack he’s going to walk away from.
The media frenzy about her is no different than about him...until this goes to court both sides will be pitting each other against each other...and the credibility of those involved. It’s show time now....
IMO and bottom line... Strauss did the deed and as usual power and influence will end this...she’ll be paid off NOT to this to trial.
I honestly don’t have a clue as to what happened. But it does appear she is dirtbag too. Just nice to see others agreeing with me now.
I just hope everyone learns from this. It may be you one day under serious charges and you would like a fair shake.
No problem. :)
..And Krauss is not a dirtbag? Come on!
Fair shake??? Since when has anyone gone into court and had a fair shake. It isn’t about the truth of what happened or not...it’s about who is going to win. There is no “justice” in the land. Anyone who thinks otherwise has their head in the sand. It’s who has the money, how long can the attorneys milk it..and what has to be done to win...and it makes no difference who falls under the bus on the way.
Being a dirt bag doesn’t equal rapist. If it did rape would be legal.
It’s not illegal to be a dirtbag, but it is illegal to rape women. You can’t really justify calling someone a rapist by saying even though he didn’t do this he’s still a dirtbag therefore, it’s ok.
Missed the point...right over your head.
So let me be clear...the gal has a shaddy background. = “dirtbag”.
Klauss has a shaddy background = Major ‘DIRTBAG’ as well.
You are still not right.
The case is still full steam ahead and all of the evidence is still valid.
We already knew Kahn had lied four different ways. All this is showing is that the maid has some questionable things that have happened outside of the rape.
You are boasting WAY too early. But I enjoy the chuckle.
This story is sourced entirely by people close to the defense. It looks like the defense has mounted a media Blitzkreig, timed to coincide with the long holiday week-end, and it looks like it’s working. Well, nobody ever said DSK’s lawyers were stupid.
OK... I’ll cop a plea to being delighted to see a French socialist head of the IMF getting hung up by his ‘nads.
But I still say that 90% of what we are hearing this weekend is a carefully choreographed and timed media blitz by the defense. We’ll see how it all plays out in the end.
I agree we’ll need to wait to see how it plays out, but my original point was we have to wait. All we had initially was a carefully choreographed communcation from the prosecution.
Remember a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, so I don’t put much faith in anything they say.
This is what unlimited funds can buy a defense, and it's worth every penny. A true tour de force.<\I>
Well, here is what i posted at #145.
I have been very suspicious of this whole story from the beginning. I can’t help wondering if this guy — jerk that he is — got set up.
But why? Perhaps he refused to go along with the Obama/Soros plan to bring down the West. I notice that he replacement at the IMF is an American.
Maybe the guy’s penchant for skirt chasing gave them the perfect set-up.
(((
I don’t know if I posted anything else, as I really don’t feel like searching.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.