Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucson SWAT Team Defends Shooting Iraq Vet 60 Times
abcnews.go.com ^ | 20 May, 2011 | ELLEN TUMPOSKY

Posted on 05/23/2011 4:37:47 AM PDT by marktwain

A Tucson, Ariz., SWAT team defends shooting an Iraq War veteran 60 times during a drug raid, although it declines to say whether it found any drugs in the house and has had to retract its claim that the veteran shot first.

And the Pima County sheriff scolded the media for "questioning the legality" of the shooting.

Jose Guerena, 26, died the morning of May 5. He was asleep in his Tucson home after working a night shift at the Asarco copper mine when his wife, Vanessa, saw the armed SWAT team outside her youngest son's bedroom window.

"She saw a man pointing at her with a gun," said Reyna Ortiz, 29, a relative who is caring for Vanessa and her children. Ortiz said Vanessa Guerena yelled, "Don't shoot! I have a baby!"

Vanessa Guerena thought the gunman might be part of a home invasion -- especially because two members of her sister-in-law's family, Cynthia and Manny Orozco, were killed last year in their Tucson home, her lawyer, Chris Scileppi, said. She shouted for her husband in the next room, and he woke up and told his wife to hide in the closet with the child, Joel, 4.

SWAT officers fired at least 71 shots at suspect Jose Guerena, a former U.S. Marine, and a family struggles to put the pieces together.

Guerena grabbed his assault rifle and was pointing it at the SWAT team, which was trying to serve a narcotics search warrant as part of a multi-house drug crackdown, when the team broke down the door. At first the Pima County Sheriff's Office said that Guerena fired first, but on Wednesday officials backtracked and said he had not. "The safety was on and he could not fire," according to the sheriff's statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: az; banglist; corruption; cwii; donutwatch; govtabuse; guerena; killswat; liberalfascism; murder; murderbyswat; rapeofliberty; swat; swatassholes; thinblueline; tucsonswatteam; tyranny; veteran
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 last
To: papertyger
Are they supposed to rely on all his years of "experience" again?

"Trust me, I shoot tons of people -- this was a good shoot." -- Sheriff Dipstick

201 posted on 05/23/2011 5:52:35 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Most SWAT teams now arrive with plenty of lights and sirens just to avoid any ID problems.

If you showed a gun, you would probably be told to drop it ASAP. Turn it toward the SWATTERS, “.....Dearly Beloved.....”


202 posted on 05/23/2011 6:36:20 PM PDT by MindBender26 (While the MSM slept.... we have become relevant media in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
If you showed a gun, you would probably be told to drop it ASAP. Turn it toward the SWATTERS, “.....Dearly Beloved.....”

What happens if you just say "Show me your ID first."?

203 posted on 05/23/2011 6:57:30 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
The war on drugs has to go.

Some guy on another thread says it is the fault of everyone who thinks drugs should be legalized that a black kid set his mother on fire.

204 posted on 05/23/2011 8:45:00 PM PDT by webheart (Just saying.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

ID ?

In the states I am familiar with, a displayed badge with a badge number ( and in some cases a name tag is required) suffices for the display of an ID.

There are two types of warrants, regular and minimal or “no-knock” warrants. No-knock are only issued when bad asses are expected. They result in evidence not being destroyed and people not being killed because they don’t have time to get their AK-47s


205 posted on 05/23/2011 8:47:53 PM PDT by MindBender26 (While the MSM slept.... we have become relevant media in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: PalmettoMason
"Safety" did not have a damn thing to do with it, Palmetto. The murdering bastards wanted to make sure that the poor guy was dead. I have read the posts of those on these threads thay, in one way or another, try to defend the SWAT guys or rationalize their conduct. In my humble opinion, no decent individual can/ will defend them. To me, their conduct is indefensible, but that hasn't stopped some from trying.

And what is even more sickening to me is that the Swat team will get away with murdering the poor guy.

206 posted on 05/23/2011 9:08:34 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

Exactly HOW have you demonstrated what?


207 posted on 05/23/2011 9:33:33 PM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

> Consider the logical chain of events.

> Cops arrive with a search warrant, or feel they have exigent reasons to search without a warrant. You, the homeowner think the warrant is defective or there are not exigent circumstances.

Consider this alternate chain of events:

Armed and masked burglars arrive posing as police SWAT. You suspect they are not police because you are an honest citizen who has never had trouble in the community:

You can either permit the entry after vocalizing your objection or resist it with force, even deadly force.

Here’s what will happen.

1) If you comply without question - you will be robbed and possibly raped/murdered at the whim of your captors.

2) If you verbally object - you will be robbed and possibly raped/murdered at the whim of your captors.

3) If you physically object with deadly force - you may win or lose, but the odds have moved sharply in your favor.


208 posted on 05/24/2011 2:39:29 AM PDT by Mr170IQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
We know they do make mistakes.

Somebody starts pounding on your door in the middle of the night, claiming to be the police. Whoever is on the other side of that door may or may not be the police.

If they are the police and you don't disarm and let them in (or wait while they break down the door), you're probably going to die. If they aren't the really the police then that's the last thing you want to do.

You won't get to see a badge, or any other kind of ID until they're in the house, and you're disarmed, and at that point it's pretty will moot.

209 posted on 05/24/2011 3:57:09 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
I take it they had to kill him to save him?

Your guess is as good as mine on that one.....

210 posted on 05/24/2011 6:36:58 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

“I’m not a fan of no-knock raids but they were developed to prevent drug dealers from flushing the evidence down the toilet before the cops gained entry. If there were ways of collecting flushed items before they hit the main line, these raids could be eliminated.”

There are ways of doing this. You flush UP the line with pressurized water, and then block the line before it hits the sewer split. It’d be far more effective than shooting and hoping it beats the flush, and far less likely to damage a property you can RICO if the criminal is dealing in it, anyway.

But fear of flushing wasn’t why they used SWAT and then shot him. They no-knocked and shot him because they thought he had guns. Take whatever lesson you want there.


211 posted on 05/26/2011 9:40:57 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic; marktwain

KGUN9 News is showing video of the SWAT raid now - I did not hear sirens;

“They’re going to fire until that threat is no longer...” - Pima County Sheriff’s Deputy explaining why they fired 71 rounds.

The toddler walked out on his own more than 15 minutes after they shot his Daddy.


212 posted on 05/26/2011 10:18:57 PM PDT by HiJinx (Old Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Most SWAT teams now arrive with plenty of lights and sirens just to avoid any ID problems.

Fine in theory. If you live in town, especially in a noisy area like near an airport, you probably have heavy curtains and extra soundproofing. And if they're doing that, why do they say they can only wait about 15 seconds before the break down the door to keep you from flushing evidence if they really believe you've already had plenty of time to determine who they are before they even got there?

213 posted on 05/27/2011 4:32:59 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I agree.


214 posted on 05/27/2011 10:52:03 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Dear Lord, Please judge Barack Hussein Obama for betraying Israel, and not the whole nation. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

btrl


215 posted on 05/28/2011 7:21:53 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (We need to limit political office holders to two terms. One in office, and one in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson