[wideawake]

you might have meant himself, not the company

Do you really believe that he is practically - as opposed to legally - separate from the company?

I’m curious why you think he should donate his assets or the radio networks’.

Because he collected that money on false pretenses and, morally, he should give that largesse to non-fraudulent entities.

[Gondring]

Do you really believe that he is practically - as opposed to legally - separate from the company?

Not for most purposes. That's why I concluded you weren't making any relevant distinction.

Because he collected that money on false pretenses and, morally, he should give that largesse to non-fraudulent entities.

False pretenses?

He offered his interpretation of the Scriptures...Scriptures that are freely available for anyone to review. If a post of yours turns out to be wrong and I believed it, do you owe a donation to a third party?!