Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP On Track To Block Obama Judicial Nominee For First Time
Fox News ^ | May 19, 2011 | Trish Turner |

Posted on 05/19/2011 8:06:07 AM PDT by yoe

Republican opposition is steadily growing against controversial University of California-Berkley law professor Goodwin Liu, President Obama's nominee for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, potentially imperiling a judicial appointment for the first time in his presidency.

Senior Republicans launched an all-out push to quash the nomination, urging their conference colleagues to support a GOP-led filibuster.

"(Liu's) record reflects a carefully honed and calculated philosophy that he developed and advanced over the course of his brief career in the ivory towers of academia and which threatens the American tradition of limited constitutional government," Sens. Charles Grassley of Iowa, top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, and senior panel member Jeff Sessions of Alabama, wrote in a letter, obtained by Fox, to their GOP colleagues Wednesday.

In a most ominous sign, former GOP members of the so-called "Gang of 14," who narrowly averted a judicial crisis back in 2005 that nearly shut down the Senate, are lining up against Liu, as well.

The somewhat undefined threshold developed by the bipartisan group back then stated that a nominee should be filibustered only under "extraordinary circumstances."

"The nomination of Mr. Goodwin Liu does rise to a level of 'extraordinary circumstances,' and therefore McCain will seek to filibuster the nomination," read a statement by the office of former Gang member John McCain.

[snip] Democrats need at least seven Republicans to keep the Liu nomination alive, but their GOP possibilities are fading fast.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.blogs.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; courts; democrats; goodwinliu; gop; judicialfascism; judiciary; liu; ninthcircuit; ninthcircus; nominee; obama; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Berkley law professor Goodwin Liu, does not read law, he makes law. He is a Marxist leaning professor who has no place in our court system. Liu is a strong proponent of judicial activism in his legal writings, a red flag if ever there was one! Mr. Liu has never worked in the private sector, always for some U.S. Government group or agency....his is a narrow view or our Constitution and those laws. Encourage your elected to turn him down for this job....Obama will have another man in his army against the people if we don't stop him.
1 posted on 05/19/2011 8:06:13 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

Ah, yes, the ever-popular Ninth Circus Court of Appeals. This guy would probably be considered the right wing element of that judicial POS.


2 posted on 05/19/2011 8:11:56 AM PDT by Walrus (Palin/Ryan in 20012 -- the "nuclear option")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

I had wondered if that whole Gang of 14 agreement was a factor. Those senators, of both parties, said filibusters would only happen in “extraordinary circumstances”.

I hope the filibuster holds. It will send a strong message to Obama about his liberal radical judicial nominees.

If there are any more Supreme Court vacancies during Obama’s term, that could be a big battle. There was no major opposition to Sotomayor or Kagan, but yet another radical liberal appointee to the Supreme Court could spark a big battle.


3 posted on 05/19/2011 8:15:10 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

Congress should just dissolve the Ninth Circus and start again. They have the power.


4 posted on 05/19/2011 8:17:14 AM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I think many see it different too when you are just replacing a lib with a lib vs. the chance to remake the court.

I think even the moderate GOPers will support a filibuster if a conservative were to leave the court during Obama’s tenure.


5 posted on 05/19/2011 8:24:01 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yoe

JUST SAY NO AND HELL NO TO OBAMA!!!!


6 posted on 05/19/2011 8:24:15 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

not nearly enough the way I see it, They Should be Removing Corrupt Judges on a Daily basis, just hold the Impeachment Hearings, bring out the corruption for all to see, and if the Senate refuses to go along, they do so at their own peril.


7 posted on 05/19/2011 8:27:01 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Our communists black Muslim King will get his way. America is in bad trouble. The communists empire, including the Democratic Party, is solidly embedded
8 posted on 05/19/2011 8:35:20 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walrus

Uh. Don’t plan any celebration dinners.


9 posted on 05/19/2011 8:43:58 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

COOL! A SECOND COMMUNIST "LIU" PURGING IN MY LIFETIME!!!


10 posted on 05/19/2011 8:44:25 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (k)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yoe

While I applaud the effort, it’s a little like locking the barn door after the horse has been stolen...

They let Sodamayor and Kagan breeze through - two flaming liberal communist douchebags got on the Supreme Court, and now we’re stuck with them until they stop breathing.

So, yeah, GOP, thanks for standing up to this latest liberal moron, but it’s a little late...


11 posted on 05/19/2011 8:58:50 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
The somewhat undefined threshold developed by the bipartisan group back then stated that a nominee should be filibustered only under "extraordinary circumstances."

Given the number of judges that were filibustered after that agreement, and how much more radical and unqualified Liu is then most of those judges, it's about time we filibustered a judge.

When

12 posted on 05/19/2011 9:06:30 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

If this guy passes, I will stay home on election day....


13 posted on 05/19/2011 9:21:23 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yoe

WOW! A vertebra!


14 posted on 05/19/2011 9:50:04 AM PDT by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

We need direct election of Federal Judges.


15 posted on 05/19/2011 9:52:19 AM PDT by circlecity (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

That’s the - how shall I say this - least wise thing I have heard in a long time.


16 posted on 05/19/2011 10:05:47 AM PDT by Wallop the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wallop the Cat

I disagree.


17 posted on 05/19/2011 10:11:00 AM PDT by circlecity (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Look at all of the $#*@! morons that are elected today. You want to give idiots like that a lifetime appointment to the federal bench?! I don’t think so.


18 posted on 05/19/2011 10:16:46 AM PDT by Wallop the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Wallop the Cat
"Look at all of the $#*@! morons that are elected today."

The number is a fraction of the number of *&%$ political hack morons who are appointed today. I'd trust the electorate over hack pols any day.

19 posted on 05/19/2011 10:23:18 AM PDT by circlecity (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Cloture vote is supposed to start at 2:00 PM EDT. A failed cloture vote does NOT kill the nomination, it preserves it. The only way to kill it is to have a majority of Senators outright vote NO to an advice and consent vote.


20 posted on 05/19/2011 10:27:36 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson