You’re right. There’s a reason it’s called “real” estate, and it’s not because there’s anything like “fake” estate.
“Real” refers to Rey Al, IE, belonging to the king.
If the property can be taken from you for not paying taxes on said property, you’re just a glorified serf and renter.
This needs to be addressed if things ever get “re-adjusted” back to individual freedom.
I’ve read different things on the etymology of the term, but in any event, when you are compelled (through the force of law) to pay a tax on something you “own”, and if this something can be take away from you, again, through the force of law, the status of being an “owner” becomes rather questionable.
I agree, it needs to be addressed, but I’ll be looking out my 3rd floor window for the magic, Skittles defecating unicorn soaring over the rainbow before I expect so serious an issue to be considered.