Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Note that this does NOT protect police if they perform the warrantless search and do not find the alleged at-risk evidence.


23 posted on 05/16/2011 12:10:16 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

****Note that this does NOT protect police if they perform the warrantless search and do not find the alleged at-risk evidence.****

Protect them from what, a few weeks paid administrative leave?


38 posted on 05/16/2011 12:16:23 PM PDT by ResponseAbility (Islam...Imperialism in a turban.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: ctdonath2
Note that this does NOT protect police if they perform the warrantless search and do not find the alleged at-risk evidence.

What if they find something completely unrelated? They are now free to claim the item not explicitly sought before breaking down the door is what they wanted. Who can challenge that claim? The cops are now free to knock down your door and go on a fishing expedition. They are only at risk if the fishing expedition yields nothing. The 4th amendment was created to prevent exactly that level of intrusion by the government. It was a bad decision.

96 posted on 05/16/2011 1:07:12 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson