Do the police at least have to have a warrant?
We don’t need no stinkin’ warrants!
Man, you'd hope so, but unlawful is a very broad brush to be sure.
RE: Do the police at least have to have a warrant?
They do and should, but this report tells us that EVEN IF THEY DON’T, no one can resist UNLAWFUL entry.
The Courts were supposed to protect ordinary citizens from tyranical acts like these. This is just one of the dominoes that are slowly falling.
No, that’d just complicate the search with a bunch of unnecessary paperwork.
Besides, a warrant can always be obtained AFTER the search. I mean, after all, how are they supposed to know what things to list put on the warrant if they haven’t been able to look for them FIRST?
Frankly, I think it’s about time the whole ‘Catch 22’ situation that law enforcement has been in for the last 220+ years was cleared up.
Things will be SO much simpler now...
/s ——————————————> [for the unusually dense]
It looks like the press got the word out to the people of the state of Indiana, now it’s time for the people of that state deal with it.
Inaction of the greatest magnitude is acceptance!
You don’t get to sit on the sidleines, reading articles in the paper, and correct the judicial blunder. If they get away with this flagrant disdain of the Law of the land! Time to mobilize en mass! Get those judges off the bench!
It’s your state, not the judges.