1 posted on
05/12/2011 11:44:59 AM PDT by
rhema
To: MplsSteve
Anticipating a veto from Gov. Mark Dayton, who wants any change in election law to have broad bipartisan support, Republicans are moving forward with legislation that would bypass him and put photo ID on the ballot in 2012 as a constitutional amendment."I would say [80 percent] is probably as close to certainty as you may hope to get in regards to the passage of a constitutional amendment," said Rep. Mary Kiffmeyer, R-Big Lake, who has led the effort for photo ID.
2 posted on
05/12/2011 11:46:04 AM PDT by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: rhema
The “group” house of cards the dems built is coming down!
3 posted on
05/12/2011 11:49:13 AM PDT by
devistate one four
(United states code 10.311 Militia Kimber CDP II .45 OORAH! TET68)
To: rhema
>> arguing that it will prevent members of some groups from voting
Let’s see if we can *name* these “members of some groups” that those howwible wepubwicans are disenfranchising, shall we?
*** The dead
*** Those in the country illegally
*** Convicted felons
*** Those who have already voted once
*** Out of state ‘rats bused in from illinois
Did I miss any?
4 posted on
05/12/2011 11:50:34 AM PDT by
Nervous Tick
(Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
To: rhema
Democrats have almost universally opposed it, arguing that it will prevent members of some groups from votingYes, groups like illegal aliens, convicted felons, and people who illegally vote multiple times.
5 posted on
05/12/2011 11:52:27 AM PDT by
Thane_Banquo
(Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
To: rhema
Such legislation should be occurring in every single state where there are a majority of republicans in the legislatures as well as holding the governor’s office.
To: rhema
Enter liberal judge in 3....2....1
9 posted on
05/12/2011 11:54:30 AM PDT by
The Toll
To: rhema
FWIW, voters in Canada must either:
1. Show one photo ID (issued by a government agency — can be a student ID);
2. Show two pieces of authorized (non-photo) ID, with the voter’s name and address; or
3. Take an oath, and have an elector from the same polling division (properly ID’d) vouch for you. This person can only vouch for one person.
To: rhema
If someone participates so little in our domestic commerce that they don't need a photo ID, they have no business making decisions about how the show is run.
14 posted on
05/12/2011 12:14:34 PM PDT by
Niteranger68
(Jared Lee Loughner - Disciple of Michael Moore)
To: rhema
There is NO VALID REASON to be against voter ID.
The only ones who are against it are always democraps... why?
You have to show your ID for practically everything else.
16 posted on
05/12/2011 12:30:41 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(this administration is WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY~!! [Palin/Bachman 2012])
To: rhema
Even here in CT you must show ID to vote, though photo ID is not required.
20 posted on
05/12/2011 7:25:48 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: rhema
If this passes, Al Franken couldn’t even be elected dog catcher.
21 posted on
05/13/2011 5:34:58 AM PDT by
radioone
(Ya' just can't make up Liberal Idiocy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson