[BladeBryan]

“Just as I figured. You changed the goal post.”

You tell not the truth. I asked from the start, “I would like to hear any living ‘constitutional scholars’ say #1 or #2.” The numbers were on the claims that eligibility required one or both parents to be citizens. Instead of moaning about liberals and what an awful troll I am, why not just answer that simple request?

[philman_36]

I asked from the start...
You might need to look at who you responded to at #75. It wasn't me.
We started our conversation at #96 after I responded to somebody else's reply to me. I didn't read your replies before that.

Then we have your question to me at...Did I miss where you cited a conservative scholar who says that the native-born child of a foreigner is ineligible?
You changed your question to me later.

You tell not the truth.
Yep, you changed the goal posts just as I predicted. You can't change that.
Bang your drum all you want. I'm done.

[philman_36]

An aside...I don't need any "scholar", constitutional or otherwise, to tell me what to think. You, unfortunately, seem to need liberals to tell you what to think.
Poor you.

[philman_36]

How about we turn your little game of "Gotcha" around and play it on you!
What conservative constitutional scholar, besides Theodore Olson (whose "conservatism" seems questionable lately), has been asked to write or comment on the issue of natural born citizenship?