Then we have your question to me at...Did I miss where you cited a conservative scholar who says that the native-born child of a foreigner is ineligible?
You changed your question to me later.
You tell not the truth.
Yep, you changed the goal posts just as I predicted. You can't change that.
Bang your drum all you want. I'm done.
“Then we have your question to me at...Did I miss where you cited a conservative scholar who says that the native-born child of a foreigner is ineligible?
You changed your question to me later.”
The answer to that question was “no”. I had not missed you citing a conservative scholar saying that. You cannot cite even one constitutional scholar who who says that the native-born child of a foreigner is ineligible. Why is that?
Oh, and by “eligible” I mean for the presidency of the United States. I shouldn’t have to point out that kind of thing, but your case, obviously I do. Don’t go citing something about eligibility for governor or something by a scholar of a completely different subject and pretending it’s somehow relevant.
“Bang your drum all you want. I’m done.”
Hahahaha... Then you posted two more times before I replied.
“How about we turn your little game of ‘Gotcha’ around and play it on you!
What conservative constitutional scholar, besides Theodore Olson (whose ‘conservatism’ seems questionable lately), has been asked to write or comment on the issue of natural born citizenship?”
See:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2686108/posts?page=1