Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crude futures fall after CME hikes margins: Rise in margin requirements hurts sentiment
Marketwatch ^ | 5.10.11 | Sarah Turner

Posted on 05/10/2011 5:20:31 AM PDT by Free Vulcan

LONDON (MarketWatch) — Crude-oil futures declined in electronic trading on Tuesday as a hike to margin requirements dampened sentiment toward the commodity.

Crude for June delivery dropped 94 cents to $101.61 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

The losses came after CME Group said it will raise margin requirements for a wide variety of crude-oil contracts.

LONDON (MarketWatch) — Crude-oil futures declined in electronic trading on Tuesday as a hike to margin requirements dampened sentiment toward the commodity.

Crude for June delivery dropped 94 cents to $101.61 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

The losses came after CME Group said it will raise margin requirements for a wide variety of crude-oil contracts.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: commodities; economy; energy; markets; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Looks like the exchanges are starting to put the bite on small speculators. Let's see though if it has any effect, I have a feeling this may be a temporary damper if the dollar keeps falling.

At least someone is trying to do something about higher gas prices. Resident Obama sure isn't.

1 posted on 05/10/2011 5:20:37 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

The new margin requirements are what caused the huge drop in silver.


2 posted on 05/10/2011 5:21:22 AM PDT by Carley (We will not tire. We will not falter. We will not fail. W, 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

I have no real understanding of all this, but I gather from what I’ve read raising the margin is a bit like upping the ante and/or the minimum bet in a poker game. Am I close?


3 posted on 05/10/2011 5:24:11 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Mergin requirements have only a temporary effect. Look for higher prices all around


4 posted on 05/10/2011 5:33:09 AM PDT by montag813 (SECURE THE BORDER! http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

The market is built entirely upon crony capitalism, try cash and delivery, then resale. The make belove business people are exempt from the law, try selling someone a house you do not own.


5 posted on 05/10/2011 5:35:58 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Bettors must “settle” the difference between the daily close and what they bet at the end of every day.

Pigs get fat.
Hogs get slaughtered.


6 posted on 05/10/2011 5:38:02 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Amount of actual money involved, the rest is credit.


7 posted on 05/10/2011 5:44:13 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
Not really. There is a passing similarity to the notion of a "minimum bet", but it is only fleeting.

Margin requirement is a figure set by the exchange and represents the amount of capital each type of trader (there are 3 types, btw) must deposit with an exchange member in order to 1) buy or sell a futures or futures option position and 2) keep that position overnight (or over several nights...).

At the end of the day session (typically, but not always 4:00pm Central time), the equity in a trader's account is computed. Almost invariably, the equity figure will have changed during the day as prices bounce around. This is the procedure known as "mark-to-market". Then the account's margin requirement is computed. If the equity in the account is below the margin requirement, the trader's brokerage firm may issue a "margin call", a demand for more the trader to deposit more equity or remove one or more of his trading positions.

When the exchange raises margin requirements (which are typically 8-15% of the value of a futures contract; the calculation for futures options is more complex), some number of people trading the market whose margin requirement was raised simply will not have enough equity in the account and will receive a margin call.

Usually, traders so affected will simply liquidate (some or all of) their positions in the market whose margin requirement was raised. When speculative interest is very high in a market, as is the case in crude just now, this liquidation will drive down prices for a time.

Hope that's of some use to you, and FReegards!

8 posted on 05/10/2011 5:51:09 AM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama -- a phony and a prick, therefore a dildo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Something like that. Most commodity contracts have a large total value. Silver for instance, is a 5,000 oz contract, about 17K worth of silver right now. You don’t have to put that much down to trade it though, generally just a small percentage of that. However, that small amount is called leverage, and it what makes commodities so risky, because if it moves against you it won’t take much to wipe that little bit you put down away.


9 posted on 05/10/2011 6:01:25 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

Yes, very helpful. I see the similarities in that after all is said and done we’re talking about the cost of being in the game.

Isn’t it amazing how time complicates things?

After careful consideration I think I’ll just stick with my usual game of poker at a neighbor’s on Sat. night.

Thanks a million!


10 posted on 05/10/2011 6:04:01 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

re: won’t take much to wipe that little bit you put down away

Is that all you have at risk? I mean, do they come looking to you for the entire difference between what you leveraged and what it ended up being worth?

Sorry to be so dense, just never took the time to figure it all out.

Thanks!


11 posted on 05/10/2011 6:07:46 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

This is a smart move by the exchanges. It will deflate the “it’s the speculators” meme and shine a bright, glaring light on Obama’s energy policy and the falling dollar.


12 posted on 05/10/2011 6:09:58 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
You do mean $175K, right?

;^)

13 posted on 05/10/2011 6:11:17 AM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama -- a phony and a prick, therefore a dildo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
It will deflate the “it’s the speculators” meme and shine a bright, glaring light on Obama’s energy policy and the falling dollar.

It also shows that $4 a gallon gas kills the economy to the point where people have no choice but to cut back their driving to the bare minimum and cut back on other discretionary purchases. The only reason oil is falling is because of falling demand.

14 posted on 05/10/2011 6:12:56 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

BTW, that was 170K, not 17K.

No, not unless you take delivery. The margin money only covers the movement of the contract up or down. Every penny that silver moves is I believe $50. If you have say 5K margin, silver could move against you a dollar before your money is wiped out. If you look at the charts, silver can move that much easily in a few hours. Hence the risk.

However, if you get close to being wiped out, you will get a margin call. If you don’t pony up more money, they liquidate your position. I know this because I used to be a margin manager, and had to do that many times.


15 posted on 05/10/2011 6:13:21 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

Yeah, freaking typo. Damn laptop, I hate their keyboards.


16 posted on 05/10/2011 6:14:39 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan; jwparkerjr
Margins were raised on silver, too. New COMEX/CME margin on 5000 oz silver is 21,600 initial, 16,000 maintenance.

I wouldn't trade silver just now with YOUR capital, let alone mine.

And yes, a 1-cent move in silver is equal to $50.

17 posted on 05/10/2011 6:19:21 AM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama -- a phony and a prick, therefore a dildo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Tom Kivisto of Tulsa learned the hard way. He took down high fast rising energy enterprize to the tune of $3 billion in margin calls.


18 posted on 05/10/2011 6:20:16 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Eh ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
It will deflate the “it’s the speculators” meme and shine a bright, glaring light on Obama’s energy policy and the falling dollar.

That's what I was thinking! This is a very shrewd move on the part of the exchange to deflate the "Holder is going after those evil speculators" crap and will put the blame more correctly on the LACK OF PRODUCT being produced because of The Won!
19 posted on 05/10/2011 6:22:35 AM PDT by ExTxMarine ("Convictions are more dangerous to truth than lies." ~ F. Nietzsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Kivisto and SEM were idiots; they made the oldest mistake in the business, namely Texas hedging. Thought the price of NG simply couldn't go down.

Can anybody say "Marcellus"? (snark, snark...)

20 posted on 05/10/2011 6:24:26 AM PDT by SAJ (Zerobama -- a phony and a prick, therefore a dildo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson