To: chessplayer
Carney: "It wouldn't be inaccurate to assume that I couldn't exactly not say that that isn't partially incorrect. On the contrary, I'm possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way and with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not know if he was armed, that indeed if he was even if he wasn't. I hope that clears that up for you, Gentlemen..."
17 posted on
05/03/2011 5:52:14 PM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(A communist is just a liberal in a hurry)
To: reagan_fanatic
Carney: “It wouldn’t be inaccurate to assume that I couldn’t exactly not say that that isn’t partially incorrect. On the contrary, I’m possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way and with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not know if he was armed, that indeed if he was even if he wasn’t. I hope that clears that up for you, Gentlemen...”
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson