I am not so sure that this is the case. The typesetting doesn't look substantially different from the Nordyke’s BC’s.
See: http://i.imgur.com/CjRtj.gif.webloc
“And why would it also say the politically correct “African” for race when the law stated that “Negro” was what was used?”
Because that requirement wasn't rigidly adhered to?
“Remember, the recent ‘release’ has been claimed to be a scanned copy of an original.”
As I understand it, the recent release is a scan of a certified document provided by the state of Hawaii. Exactly what Birthers have been demanding for so long.
Aaaannnddd... Then you'll notice they immediately moved the goalposts when this latest bit of info didn't conform to their various invented scenarios.
Intelligent people always stuck to the concept that, given who Obama's father was, the child (no matter where he was born) could not be a Natural Born Citizen. That really was the essential point, although people like Donald Trump seemed to miss it.
If the BC had come out and said that Frank Marshall Davis was the father, then Obama might have (in a way) been in a good position. But, since the BC confirms that his father was who we all expected -- a British subject -- then the NBC issue is as valid today as it was 2 years go. No need to move any goalposts.
But let me just say: I have zero faith that the US Supreme Court will make any ruling on NBC which would endanger Obama's presidency, so I see the entire BC/NBC/Hi/Kenya issue to be rather pointless at this time.
