Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: El Sordo

“They were obviously false “

So why would a supposedly typed 1961 ‘original’ be perfectly spaced when in 1961 it wasn’t happening?
And why would it also say the politically correct “African” for race when the law stated that “Negro” was what was used?
Remember, the recent ‘release’ has been claimed to be a scanned copy of an original.


19 posted on 05/02/2011 11:47:02 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare
“So why would a supposedly typed 1961 ‘original’ be perfectly spaced when in 1961 it wasn’t happening?”

I am not so sure that this is the case. The typesetting doesn't look substantially different from the Nordyke’s BC’s.

See: http://i.imgur.com/CjRtj.gif.webloc

“And why would it also say the politically correct “African” for race when the law stated that “Negro” was what was used?”

Because that requirement wasn't rigidly adhered to?

“Remember, the recent ‘release’ has been claimed to be a scanned copy of an original.”

As I understand it, the recent release is a scan of a certified document provided by the state of Hawaii. Exactly what Birthers have been demanding for so long.

Aaaannnddd... Then you'll notice they immediately moved the goalposts when this latest bit of info didn't conform to their various invented scenarios.

26 posted on 05/02/2011 11:58:13 AM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson