I think you are confounding a demand for certitude in evidence for something you believe to be "birtherism" whichis presumably looking for evidence of a conspiracy.
Hardly the case. The big issue with Obama's birth has been "What Is The Truth" and "Who Are The Witnesses".
Turns out folks have spent three years looking for some witness to his birth other than his aunt (who may or may not have mispoke when she said she was there).
Obama, if he had the "names" of the folks who signed his birth certificate could have called the dispute on that question THREE YEARS AGO.
He didn't. The suggestion now is that he may have had a long form counterfeited, or that he didn't know there was a difference between "long and short". I'd prefer that he had something counterfeited than that he be a total idiot.
Too many Conservatives want us to believe that Obama can think, and plan, and do something besides go to parties. Yet, he took three years proving to us HE KNOWS NOTHINK.
“some witness to his birth other than his aunt (who may or may not have mispoke when she said she was there).”
I’d like to see, and it may be out there and I just haven’t seen it, a transcript of the lady’s interview, translated by an indifferent panel of people. Maybe former Brit officials from the “Protectorate” days. I doubt that she “misspoke,” but she may have been mis-translated during the course of that interview. Frankly,,, that would carry a lot of weight with me!
Bogie