Note the chromatic aberration. This document is in fact a color scan. And here is a blown-up piece of the so-called "scan" of Obama's document:
Note the absence of chromatic aberration. The Obama White House document is not an unaltered color scan.
Posted on 04/30/2011 8:37:33 PM PDT by Triple
Note the chromatic aberration. This document is in fact a color scan. And here is a blown-up piece of the so-called "scan" of Obama's document:
Note the absence of chromatic aberration. The Obama White House document is not an unaltered color scan.
His video explanation of the chromatic aberration is what convinced me that those who are whining to “move on” and about how “this makes us look like morons” were wrong, and that this whole thing is just one more case of Obama playing the nation for suckers.
The BC pdf file proves nothing about Obama’s legitimacy.
Anyone who still thinks this is a scan of a 50 year old piece of paper has swallowed a heapin’ helpin’ of Obama kool-ade.
PS, you are right that nothing will be done about it. RINOs are gutless, and dems don’t care about The Constitution, and the media are his propaganda cheerleaders. So yeah, we’re still screwed.
Several people have suggested Trump is in the middle of this, you noticed how he has moved on the school records now. I don’t trust that guy, I liked him at first, but now he is looking very complicit in all this, IMHO.
Denninger is the guy that made me do a 180 on this. I was all ready to breathe a sigh of relief and say, finally, Obama has done the right thing. But I’m a dope like that sometimes, I wanted to put all this BC stuff in the past. And I think all our radio guys and gals have done exactly that. We’re sold down the river brothers and sisters.
Citizenship is passed through the father. His (alleged) father was a British citizen. Stanley Dunham was indeed a US citizen, but the meaning of natural born citizen means that both parents must be citizens. Hence, he is not eligible.
Not NBC, his father, if you take him at his word, was a communist foreigner. Unless you believe anchor babys are NBC.
If that’s the case, then what is there to argue about? Why haven’t we started the removal proceedings? There must be one politician left in Congress who will not accept an ineligible leader.
I believe that under common law, the citizenship of the Dad is historically the only one that mattered.
Some argue that neither were President Arthur’s parents.
And because that generation didn’t enforce the NBC clause the clause becomes null and void!
I share your thoughts on that video. Very convincing - no nonsense
as I understand it, both parent must be US citizen so if obama’s father was US citizen and mother kenyan, he still not qualified
The issue is no longer about NBC or not. We now have in evidence two forgeries from this filth in the Oval Office, and not one single legal recourse will be allowed to oppose them. If that hasn’t told We The People that we are no longer the sovereigns of this now dead Constitutional Republic, well, we don’t deserve our freedoms.
where do you get the, citizen is passed through father, because if thats the case, democrats will argue that that is sexist and make it that if mother is US citizen ship then its okay
So what does that mean?
Karl Denninger supported Barack Obama in 2008. I know, I participated on Ticker Forum during the course of 2007 - 2008, and was very put off by it. Ticker Forum doesn’t appear to be the busy place it once was. Maybe “Obot” Karl Denninger is just trolling for site hits like all the others who are cynically stirring the pot with this.
The eligiblity of Barack Obama is in doubt at best, based upon the original intent of the Framers of the Constitution. That much is clear. The birth certificate thing is about as clear as mud. This game of Where’s Waldo, trying to be the next Buckhead of Rathergate fame, leads nowhere but occupies a lot of mindspace and it certainly runs down the clock.
It’s too late to do anything this term. People are keeping their powder dry for 2012.
Agreed. The citizenship requirements for the office of President are more stringent than those for “regular” citizenship. Amazing how easily the ignorant can be fooled. BTW, in 1961 America, Obama Sr. would have been classified as “Negro”, not “African”!
Post # 32. You are correct.
As for post # 34, this has long been customary in international law. Sexist it may be, but it is still true.
Agree.
Folks, pay attention: Just as Watergate was about the cover-up not a botched burglary, this story is now about the creation of an official document that was presented to the American public as if it were something it is not.
My theory is that the original paper BC was destroyed long ago when vital records were microfilmed. That film contains the image of the “curl” of the paper in the book, and whatever was originally typed or written on the form. The microfilm was later destroyed when vital records moved to digital form, so now all we have is a scan of a microfilm of a piece of paper. In other words, an electronic image that has no “provenance” or proof that it is what it purports to be.
This is just a theory but it makes sense. What does not make sense is why anyone would accept what the WH put out as anything more authentic than what any Photoshop user creates every day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.