Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Solitar
Flood borne silt would be one of the best things for that farmland. Millenia of annual floods is why it is farmland.

If flooding is so beneficial, why would the farmers object? And why wouldn't Cairo want to be flooded?

14 posted on 04/30/2011 7:00:49 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

The farmer I heard on the radio yesterday said it would take a really long time before the soil could be farmed again. And he said it was wrong that their farms and lives would be destroyed because of Illinois’ negligence.


23 posted on 04/30/2011 7:34:52 PM PDT by Fu-fu2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: okie01
Flood borne silt would be one of the best things for that farmland. Millenia of annual floods is why it is farmland.

It is not black dirt that would inundate the area. The farm land would be filled with sand and debris... it would take decades to recoup from the damage, and some think the land would never be used for farming again.

The land has been farmed for generations.

24 posted on 04/30/2011 7:41:01 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson