Skip to comments.
Obama Administration punishes reporter for using multimedia
SFGate,com ^
| A.D. 28 April 2011
| Phil Bronstein
Posted on 04/29/2011 6:13:02 AM PDT by Robert Drobot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
No surprise here. The race baiting criminal-in-chief is all about document fraud, media control, and twisting truth; his 24-7 political stock and trade.
To: Robert Drobot
It says in the article that the female reporter was even warned about reporting the very fact that she was removed from the reporter pool;BECAUSE she dared to take photos of people protesting Obama. This is very telling. The mainstream media blindly cover for him on every issue but that he is acting like a dictator and controls. The media are the very essence of the progressive commiecrat movement yet they cannot accept the full ideal of freedom of press; being taken away?
2
posted on
04/29/2011 6:19:13 AM PDT
by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(If Obama announced his resignation that would probably bring gas to $2.30 within an hour.)
To: Robert Drobot
From the article:
What's worse: more than a few journalists familiar with this story are aware of some implied threats from the White House of additional and wider punishment if Carla's spanking became public. Really? That's a heavy hand usually reserved for places other than the land of the free.
Frightening
3
posted on
04/29/2011 6:22:02 AM PDT
by
Neverforget01
(It Could Have Been Worse Is Not A Defense For Bad Policy)
To: Robert Drobot
And we are going to hear about this in the MSM? NEVER.
This POS has gone completely over the edge. His handlers are now concerned about his sacred image? Remember, the whitehouse now puts its own news out, has done it for what, over a year and these jerks who are spoon fed their daily dose of pre printed crap just dole it out to the public as first hand reporting.
I am so sick of this bunch, I cannot wait till they are all removed and hopefully banished to the Congo where their antics would be standard fare.
4
posted on
04/29/2011 6:26:07 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
To: Robert Drobot
Maybe the media will wise as to what a control freak they are covering and quit salivating at everything.
5
posted on
04/29/2011 6:27:03 AM PDT
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Robert Drobot
But part of the press' job is to do the opposite, to strip away the cloaks and veneers.Who'd'a thunk it, based on their behavior for the last several years??
6
posted on
04/29/2011 6:27:49 AM PDT
by
knittnmom
(Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
To: Robert Drobot
The most transparent presidency ever...............
7
posted on
04/29/2011 6:33:09 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
To: Robert Drobot
Somehow I don’t think the reporter would’ve been banned had she recorded an adoring fainter at one of these Obam-asms...
8
posted on
04/29/2011 6:33:22 AM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
(How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
To: yldstrk
Maybe pigs will fly...............
9
posted on
04/29/2011 6:33:49 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
To: Robert Drobot
...if the media ever abandoned the bowing clown he’d be lost.
10
posted on
04/29/2011 6:34:05 AM PDT
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Mouton
What is really interesting are the comments posted after the article. When Obama has lot San Francisco, I will be hopeful for 2012.
To: DJ Frisat
At some point they will begin confiscating cell phones, blackberries, iPads and notebooks or anything that looks like a camera at all presidential gatherings.........
12
posted on
04/29/2011 6:35:51 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
To: Red Badger
Sadly, I think you’re right. Kind of like the municipalities that ban camcorders attempting to record policemen at work, fearing potentially illegal or embarrassing activities.
13
posted on
04/29/2011 6:41:03 AM PDT
by
DJ Frisat
(How's that change workin' out for ya, Obama voters?)
To: Robert Drobot
14
posted on
04/29/2011 6:41:54 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
To: Red Badger; All
"The most transparent presidency ever..............."
15
posted on
04/29/2011 6:43:27 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: Neverforget01
16
posted on
04/29/2011 6:46:14 AM PDT
by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(If Obama announced his resignation that would probably bring gas to $2.30 within an hour.)
To: FrankR
17
posted on
04/29/2011 6:48:53 AM PDT
by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(If Obama announced his resignation that would probably bring gas to $2.30 within an hour.)
To: yldstrk
Yes, they could take him down when they’ve had enough. Wonder when that will happen.
To: ilovesarah2012
Love the comments!
I read it fast, but did it say exactly what she taped that wasn't released? I didn't see that. Fishy.
To: DJ Frisat
Stalin and Mao would be proud..............
20
posted on
04/29/2011 7:17:34 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Mitt Romney: The Harold Stassen of the 21st century........)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
